Comparing the effects of cortical resection and vagus nerve stimulation in patients with nonlesional extratemporal epilepsy
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F13%3A00071959" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/13:00071959 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.05.036" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.05.036</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.05.036" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.05.036</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparing the effects of cortical resection and vagus nerve stimulation in patients with nonlesional extratemporal epilepsy
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The main purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the effects of resective surgery (RESgr-26 patients) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNSgr-35 patients) on seizure frequency (2 and 5 years after surgery) in patients with nonlesional extratemporalepilepsy (NLexTLE). We analyzed hospital admission costs directly associated with epilepsy (HACE) in both groups at the same follow-up. The decrease in seizure frequency from the preoperative levels, in both VNSgr and RESgr, was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The seizure frequency reduction did not differ significantly between the follow-up visits for either group (p = 0.221 at 2 years and 0.218 at 5 years). A significantly higher number of Engel I and Engel I + II patients were found in RESgr than in VNSgr at both follow-up visits (p = 0.04 and 0.007, respectively). Using McHugh classification, we did not find statistically significant differences between both groups at both follow-up visits.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparing the effects of cortical resection and vagus nerve stimulation in patients with nonlesional extratemporal epilepsy
Popis výsledku anglicky
The main purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the effects of resective surgery (RESgr-26 patients) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNSgr-35 patients) on seizure frequency (2 and 5 years after surgery) in patients with nonlesional extratemporalepilepsy (NLexTLE). We analyzed hospital admission costs directly associated with epilepsy (HACE) in both groups at the same follow-up. The decrease in seizure frequency from the preoperative levels, in both VNSgr and RESgr, was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The seizure frequency reduction did not differ significantly between the follow-up visits for either group (p = 0.221 at 2 years and 0.218 at 5 years). A significantly higher number of Engel I and Engel I + II patients were found in RESgr than in VNSgr at both follow-up visits (p = 0.04 and 0.007, respectively). Using McHugh classification, we did not find statistically significant differences between both groups at both follow-up visits.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FH - Neurologie, neurochirurgie, neurovědy
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/ED1.1.00%2F02.0068" target="_blank" >ED1.1.00/02.0068: CEITEC - central european institute of technology</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2013
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR
ISSN
1525-5050
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
28
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
474-480
Kód UT WoS článku
000323188200023
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—