Is Electrophysiology Useful in the Differential Diagnostics of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Diabetic Polyneuropathy?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F14%3A00077839" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/14:00077839 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/65269705:_____/14:00061817

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Is Electrophysiology Useful in the Differential Diagnostics of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Diabetic Polyneuropathy?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Aim: To evaluate validity of electrophysiological examination in the differential diagnostics of lumbar spinal stenosis (LS) and diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN). Methods: Electrophysiological parameters were examined in 68 patients with clinically symptomatic LS, in 28 patients with DPN, and in a group of 32 healthy volunteers. Results: Electrophysiological parameters evaluated from the upper extremities (F-wave latency of the ulnar nerve and radial SNAP amplitude), all the latencies measured in the lowerextremities (tibial F-wave, soleus H-reflex and spinal latency of MEP), and the sural SNAP amplitude contributed significantly to distinguishing the LS from DPN patients. ROC analysis, however, disclosed only two electrophysiological parameters as effective in independent discrimination between the LS and DPN patient groups: ulnar F-wave latency (cut-off point at 24.2 ms, sensitivity 82.7% and specificity 63.9%); and radial SNAP amplitude (cut-off point at 10.5 ?V, sensitivity 75.5%, sp

Název v anglickém jazyce

Is Electrophysiology Useful in the Differential Diagnostics of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Diabetic Polyneuropathy?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Aim: To evaluate validity of electrophysiological examination in the differential diagnostics of lumbar spinal stenosis (LS) and diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN). Methods: Electrophysiological parameters were examined in 68 patients with clinically symptomatic LS, in 28 patients with DPN, and in a group of 32 healthy volunteers. Results: Electrophysiological parameters evaluated from the upper extremities (F-wave latency of the ulnar nerve and radial SNAP amplitude), all the latencies measured in the lowerextremities (tibial F-wave, soleus H-reflex and spinal latency of MEP), and the sural SNAP amplitude contributed significantly to distinguishing the LS from DPN patients. ROC analysis, however, disclosed only two electrophysiological parameters as effective in independent discrimination between the LS and DPN patient groups: ulnar F-wave latency (cut-off point at 24.2 ms, sensitivity 82.7% and specificity 63.9%); and radial SNAP amplitude (cut-off point at 10.5 ?V, sensitivity 75.5%, sp

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FH - Neurologie, neurochirurgie, neurovědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Česká a Slovenská neurologie a neurochirurgie

ISSN

1210-7859

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

77

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

684-690

Kód UT WoS článku

000346229200003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—