Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in the Czech Republic: A 2011 National Survey

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F15%3A00082938" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/15:00082938 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11110/15:10294926 RIV/00216208:11130/15:10294926 RIV/65269705:_____/15:00063080 RIV/00064203:_____/15:10294926 RIV/00064165:_____/15:10294926

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000572" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000572</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000572" target="_blank" >10.1213/ANE.0000000000000572</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in the Czech Republic: A 2011 National Survey

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this national survey was to determine current anesthesia practices for cesarean delivery in the Czech Republic. METHODS: In November 2011, we invited all departments of obstetric anesthesia in the Czech Republic to participatein a prospective study to monitor consecutive peripartum obstetric anesthesia procedures. Data were recorded online in the TrialDB database (Yale University, New Haven, CT). RESULTS: The response rate was 51% (49 of 97 departments); participating centersrepresented 60% of all births in the country during the study period. There were 1943 cases of peripartum anesthesia care, of which 1166 cases (60%) were anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Estimates were weighted based on population distribution of cesarean delivery among types of participating centers. Neuraxial anesthesia was used in 55.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.8%?58.5%); the distribution of anesthesia techniques differed among type of participating center.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in the Czech Republic: A 2011 National Survey

Popis výsledku anglicky

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this national survey was to determine current anesthesia practices for cesarean delivery in the Czech Republic. METHODS: In November 2011, we invited all departments of obstetric anesthesia in the Czech Republic to participatein a prospective study to monitor consecutive peripartum obstetric anesthesia procedures. Data were recorded online in the TrialDB database (Yale University, New Haven, CT). RESULTS: The response rate was 51% (49 of 97 departments); participating centersrepresented 60% of all births in the country during the study period. There were 1943 cases of peripartum anesthesia care, of which 1166 cases (60%) were anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Estimates were weighted based on population distribution of cesarean delivery among types of participating centers. Neuraxial anesthesia was used in 55.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.8%?58.5%); the distribution of anesthesia techniques differed among type of participating center.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FP - Ostatní lékařské obory

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/NT13906" target="_blank" >NT13906: Moderní postup myorelaxace a zvratu nervosvalové blokády při celkové anestezii u císařského řezu</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Anesthesia and Analgesia

ISSN

0003-2999

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

120

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

1303-1308

Kód UT WoS článku

000354864100020

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—