Limb volume measurements: comparison of accuracy and decisive parameters of the most used present methods

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F15%3A00086429" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/15:00086429 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00159816:_____/15:00063956 RIV/00216305:26620/15:PU119358

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1468-7" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1468-7</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1468-7" target="_blank" >10.1186/s40064-015-1468-7</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Limb volume measurements: comparison of accuracy and decisive parameters of the most used present methods

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Limb volume measurements are used for evaluating growth of muscle mass and effectivity of strength training. Beside sport sciences, it is used e.g. for detection of oedemas, lymphedemas or carcinomas or for examinations of muscle atrophy. There are several commonly used methods, but there is a lack of clear comparison, which shows their advantages and limits. The accuracy of each method is uncertainly estimated only. The aim of this paper is to determine and experimentally verify their accuracy and compare them among each other. Water Displacement Method (WD), three methods based on circumferential measures?Frustum Sign Model (FSM), Disc Model (DM), Partial Frustum Model (PFM) and two 3D scan based methods Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) were compared. Precise reference cylinders and limbs of two human subjects were measured 10 times by each method. Personal dependency of methods was also tested by measuring 10 times the same object by 3 different people.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Limb volume measurements: comparison of accuracy and decisive parameters of the most used present methods

Popis výsledku anglicky

Limb volume measurements are used for evaluating growth of muscle mass and effectivity of strength training. Beside sport sciences, it is used e.g. for detection of oedemas, lymphedemas or carcinomas or for examinations of muscle atrophy. There are several commonly used methods, but there is a lack of clear comparison, which shows their advantages and limits. The accuracy of each method is uncertainly estimated only. The aim of this paper is to determine and experimentally verify their accuracy and compare them among each other. Water Displacement Method (WD), three methods based on circumferential measures?Frustum Sign Model (FSM), Disc Model (DM), Partial Frustum Model (PFM) and two 3D scan based methods Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) were compared. Precise reference cylinders and limbs of two human subjects were measured 10 times by each method. Personal dependency of methods was also tested by measuring 10 times the same object by 3 different people.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FP - Ostatní lékařské obory

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

SpringerPlus

ISSN

2193-1801

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

4

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

1-15

Kód UT WoS článku

000368709400003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—