Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F23%3A00133389" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/23:00133389 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2023/03000/revising_the_jbi_quantitative_critical_appraisal.4.aspx" target="_blank" >https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2023/03000/revising_the_jbi_quantitative_critical_appraisal.4.aspx</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00125" target="_blank" >10.11124/JBIES-22-00125</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

JBI offers a suite of critical appraisal instruments that are freely available to systematic reviewers and researchers investigating the methodological limitations of primary research studies. The JBI instruments are designed to be study-specific and are presented as questions in a checklist. The JBI instruments have existed in a checklist-style format for approximately 20 years; however, as the field of research synthesis expands, many of the tools offered by JBI have become outdated. The JBI critical appraisal tools for quantitative studies (eg, randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies) must be updated to reflect the current methodologies in this field. Cognizant of this and the recent developments in risk-of-bias science, the JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group was tasked with updating the current quantitative critical appraisal instruments. This paper details the methods and rationale that the JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group followed when updating the JBI critical appraisal instruments for quantitative study designs. We detail the key changes made to the tools and highlight how these changes reflect current methodological developments in this field.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process

Popis výsledku anglicky

JBI offers a suite of critical appraisal instruments that are freely available to systematic reviewers and researchers investigating the methodological limitations of primary research studies. The JBI instruments are designed to be study-specific and are presented as questions in a checklist. The JBI instruments have existed in a checklist-style format for approximately 20 years; however, as the field of research synthesis expands, many of the tools offered by JBI have become outdated. The JBI critical appraisal tools for quantitative studies (eg, randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies) must be updated to reflect the current methodologies in this field. Cognizant of this and the recent developments in risk-of-bias science, the JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group was tasked with updating the current quantitative critical appraisal instruments. This paper details the methods and rationale that the JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group followed when updating the JBI critical appraisal instruments for quantitative study designs. We detail the key changes made to the tools and highlight how these changes reflect current methodological developments in this field.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30230 - Other clinical medicine subjects

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/LTC20031" target="_blank" >LTC20031: Towards an International Network for Evidence-based Research in Clinical Health Research in the Czech Republic</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

JBI Evidence Synthesis

ISSN

2689-8381

e-ISSN

2689-8381

Svazek periodika

21

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

478-493

Kód UT WoS článku

000945987900004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85144956229