The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for quasi-experimental studies

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15410%2F24%3A73630173" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15410/24:73630173 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2024/03000/the_revised_jbi_critical_appraisal_tool_for_the.4.aspx" target="_blank" >https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2024/03000/the_revised_jbi_critical_appraisal_tool_for_the.4.aspx</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00268" target="_blank" >10.11124/JBIES-23-00268</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for quasi-experimental studies

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Systematic reviews of effectiveness offer a rigorous synthesis of the best evidence available regarding the effects of interventions or treatments. Randomized controlled trials are considered the optimal study design for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions and are the ideal study design for inclusion in a systematic review of effectiveness. In the absence of randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies may be relied on to provide information on treatment or intervention effectiveness. However, such studies are subject to unique considerations regarding their internal validity and, consequently, the assessment of the risk of bias of these studies needs to consider these features of design and conduct. The JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group has recently commenced updating the suite of JBI critical appraisal tools for quantitative study designs to align with the latest advancements in risk of bias assessment. This paper presents the revised critical appraisal tool for risk of bias assessment of quasi-experimental studies; offers practical guidance for its use; provides examples for interpreting the results of risk of bias assessment; and discusses major changes from the previous version, along with the justifications for those changes.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for quasi-experimental studies

Popis výsledku anglicky

Systematic reviews of effectiveness offer a rigorous synthesis of the best evidence available regarding the effects of interventions or treatments. Randomized controlled trials are considered the optimal study design for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions and are the ideal study design for inclusion in a systematic review of effectiveness. In the absence of randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies may be relied on to provide information on treatment or intervention effectiveness. However, such studies are subject to unique considerations regarding their internal validity and, consequently, the assessment of the risk of bias of these studies needs to consider these features of design and conduct. The JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group has recently commenced updating the suite of JBI critical appraisal tools for quantitative study designs to align with the latest advancements in risk of bias assessment. This paper presents the revised critical appraisal tool for risk of bias assessment of quasi-experimental studies; offers practical guidance for its use; provides examples for interpreting the results of risk of bias assessment; and discusses major changes from the previous version, along with the justifications for those changes.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30302 - Epidemiology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

ISSN

2689-8381

e-ISSN

2689-8381

Svazek periodika

22

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

AU - Austrálie

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

378-388

Kód UT WoS článku

001233194300006

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85187798157