The influence of platform switching and platform matching on marginal bone loss in immediately inserted dental implants: a retrospective clinical study

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F25%3A00140831" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/25:00140831 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journalimplantdent.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40729-025-00604-y" target="_blank" >https://journalimplantdent.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40729-025-00604-y</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-025-00604-y" target="_blank" >10.1186/s40729-025-00604-y</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The influence of platform switching and platform matching on marginal bone loss in immediately inserted dental implants: a retrospective clinical study

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

PurposeThe aim of this retrospective study was to investigate and compare the effects of platform switching (PS) and platform matching (PM) on marginal bone loss (MBL) and clinical parameters in immediately inserted dental implants.MethodsThirty-seven patients were included (PS group: twenty-one patients, PM group: sixteen patients), with follow-up periods ranging from six months to 23 years. MBL was measured using orthopantomograms (OPG), and implant success was evaluated using the Buser, Albrektsson, and Attia criteria. Regression analysis was conducted to assess total bone loss.ResultsThe BEGO RI implant system was used in 83.8% of cases. Mesial MBL averaged 0.26 mm in the PS group and 0.75 mm in the PM group, while distal MBL was 0.68 mm for the PS group and 0.53 mm for the PM group. A significant difference was observed in mesial MBL, with the PS group showing less bone loss (p. = 0.044). Regression analysis indicated that PM implants were associated with significantly greater mesial bone loss compared to PS implants (p. = 0.039). No significant differences in implant success were observed between the PS and PM groups based on the Buser score, Albrektsson criteria, and Attia score.ConclusionBoth PS and PM implants showed comparable long-term functionality. No significant differences were found in total bone loss between the groups, but PS implants showed significantly lower mesial MBL. While both systems are viable for immediate implantation, PS implants may offer advantages in preserving peri-implant bone. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The influence of platform switching and platform matching on marginal bone loss in immediately inserted dental implants: a retrospective clinical study

Popis výsledku anglicky

PurposeThe aim of this retrospective study was to investigate and compare the effects of platform switching (PS) and platform matching (PM) on marginal bone loss (MBL) and clinical parameters in immediately inserted dental implants.MethodsThirty-seven patients were included (PS group: twenty-one patients, PM group: sixteen patients), with follow-up periods ranging from six months to 23 years. MBL was measured using orthopantomograms (OPG), and implant success was evaluated using the Buser, Albrektsson, and Attia criteria. Regression analysis was conducted to assess total bone loss.ResultsThe BEGO RI implant system was used in 83.8% of cases. Mesial MBL averaged 0.26 mm in the PS group and 0.75 mm in the PM group, while distal MBL was 0.68 mm for the PS group and 0.53 mm for the PM group. A significant difference was observed in mesial MBL, with the PS group showing less bone loss (p. = 0.044). Regression analysis indicated that PM implants were associated with significantly greater mesial bone loss compared to PS implants (p. = 0.039). No significant differences in implant success were observed between the PS and PM groups based on the Buser score, Albrektsson criteria, and Attia score.ConclusionBoth PS and PM implants showed comparable long-term functionality. No significant differences were found in total bone loss between the groups, but PS implants showed significantly lower mesial MBL. While both systems are viable for immediate implantation, PS implants may offer advantages in preserving peri-implant bone. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30208 - Dentistry, oral surgery and medicine

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/LX22NPO5101" target="_blank" >LX22NPO5101: Národní institut pro výzkum socioekonomických dopadů nemocí a systémových rizik</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY

ISSN

2198-4034

e-ISSN

2198-4034

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

JP - Japonsko

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

1-12

Kód UT WoS článku

001439256100001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—