Processes for Developing Plain Language Versions of Guidelines Recommendations: A Scoping Review

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F25%3A00144748" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/25:00144748 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70256" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70256</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.70256" target="_blank" >10.1111/jep.70256</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Processes for Developing Plain Language Versions of Guidelines Recommendations: A Scoping Review

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Rationale Plain language recommendations (PLRs) offer clear and understandable statements based on trustworthy guidelines. Objective We aimed to synthesise methodological evidence for developing PLRs in the health care context. Methods We followed the JBI methodology for scoping review development and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping review reporting. PLRs in the context of health care guidelines or patient versions of guidelines were included. A systematic search was run in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and the repositories of guideline developers until November 2023. Due to the researchs longitudinal nature, the search was updated in May 2025 to verify findings gathered so far. Reviewers extracted data independently and synthesised evidence narratively. Results In total, 2512 citations and 66 repositories of guideline developers were screened. Nine articles from databases and eight documents representing seven sources of evidence from guideline developers' repositories were included in the final synthesis. Information about PLRs, their development, and methodology were summarised. Various infographics are used when creating PLRs. The target groups of PLRs are, e.g. patients, policymakers, the public, and healthcare providers. The patients could be involved in creating PLRs. The developers can draw from the GIN Public Toolkit, RIGHT-PVG checklist or DISCERN. Although these methodologies generally cover the development of knowledge translation tools and patients' version of guidelines (PVGs). Numerous tools can be used to translate scientific language and to formulate PLRs. Conclusion We propose policy support for the conduct and implementation of PLRs for healthcare guidelines drawn from available evidence-based resources identified by our review. It is desirable to report approaches for communicating recommendations from healthcare guidelines and verify the actionability and understandability of these formats.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Processes for Developing Plain Language Versions of Guidelines Recommendations: A Scoping Review

Popis výsledku anglicky

Rationale Plain language recommendations (PLRs) offer clear and understandable statements based on trustworthy guidelines. Objective We aimed to synthesise methodological evidence for developing PLRs in the health care context. Methods We followed the JBI methodology for scoping review development and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping review reporting. PLRs in the context of health care guidelines or patient versions of guidelines were included. A systematic search was run in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and the repositories of guideline developers until November 2023. Due to the researchs longitudinal nature, the search was updated in May 2025 to verify findings gathered so far. Reviewers extracted data independently and synthesised evidence narratively. Results In total, 2512 citations and 66 repositories of guideline developers were screened. Nine articles from databases and eight documents representing seven sources of evidence from guideline developers' repositories were included in the final synthesis. Information about PLRs, their development, and methodology were summarised. Various infographics are used when creating PLRs. The target groups of PLRs are, e.g. patients, policymakers, the public, and healthcare providers. The patients could be involved in creating PLRs. The developers can draw from the GIN Public Toolkit, RIGHT-PVG checklist or DISCERN. Although these methodologies generally cover the development of knowledge translation tools and patients' version of guidelines (PVGs). Numerous tools can be used to translate scientific language and to formulate PLRs. Conclusion We propose policy support for the conduct and implementation of PLRs for healthcare guidelines drawn from available evidence-based resources identified by our review. It is desirable to report approaches for communicating recommendations from healthcare guidelines and verify the actionability and understandability of these formats.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30304 - Public and environmental health

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/NU23-09-00328" target="_blank" >NU23-09-00328: Metodika tvorby laických doporučení k přenosu znalostí na podporu na důkazech založeného rozhodování ve zdravotnictví v České republice</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

ISSN

1356-1294

e-ISSN

1365-2753

Svazek periodika

31

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

1-18

Kód UT WoS článku

001585890700015

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105015000710