Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

GOLEM V2 BIORELEVANT DISSOLUTION DEVICE: TAPPING THE POTENTIAL IN PROLONGED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14160%2F25%3A00144372" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14160/25:00144372 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.ptfarm.pl/download/?file=File%2FActa_Poloniae%2F2024%2F5%2F851.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.ptfarm.pl/download/?file=File%2FActa_Poloniae%2F2024%2F5%2F851.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.32383/appdr/199377" target="_blank" >10.32383/appdr/199377</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    GOLEM V2 BIORELEVANT DISSOLUTION DEVICE: TAPPING THE POTENTIAL IN PROLONGED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Dynamic biorelevant dissolution devices have become an important part of pharmaceutical research and development. Golem v2 represents such an instrument. The aim of this study was to examine its potential for use in the evaluation of standard hydrophilic, lipophilic, and dual matrices. The effect of the agitation rate was observed. The obtained profiles were assessed based on difference and similarity factors compared with the USP II profiles. Selected kinetic and release mechanism models were used in this study. Hydrophilic matrices differed in modified release excipient hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (10-30%), and apart from the lowest 10% concentration, the profiles were found to be similar to standard dissolution. Lipophilic matrices differed in tablet hardness, which was shown to be a major factor resulting in different profiles. Their Golem v2 profiles were also not similar to the corresponding USP II dissolution profiles, hinting at possible discriminatory differences and intriguing options for erosion-based dosage forms. Similar behavior was observed for the dual-matrix tablets. Different agitation rates yielded similar profiles. Additionally, the pressure and force values were measured using the elements of their own construction. Depending on the volume and agitation rate, the difference pressure ranged from 0.29 +/- 0.04 kPa to 1.66 +/- 0.03 kPa, suggesting values similar to pressure baseline in vivo.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    GOLEM V2 BIORELEVANT DISSOLUTION DEVICE: TAPPING THE POTENTIAL IN PROLONGED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Dynamic biorelevant dissolution devices have become an important part of pharmaceutical research and development. Golem v2 represents such an instrument. The aim of this study was to examine its potential for use in the evaluation of standard hydrophilic, lipophilic, and dual matrices. The effect of the agitation rate was observed. The obtained profiles were assessed based on difference and similarity factors compared with the USP II profiles. Selected kinetic and release mechanism models were used in this study. Hydrophilic matrices differed in modified release excipient hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (10-30%), and apart from the lowest 10% concentration, the profiles were found to be similar to standard dissolution. Lipophilic matrices differed in tablet hardness, which was shown to be a major factor resulting in different profiles. Their Golem v2 profiles were also not similar to the corresponding USP II dissolution profiles, hinting at possible discriminatory differences and intriguing options for erosion-based dosage forms. Similar behavior was observed for the dual-matrix tablets. Different agitation rates yielded similar profiles. Additionally, the pressure and force values were measured using the elements of their own construction. Depending on the volume and agitation rate, the difference pressure ranged from 0.29 +/- 0.04 kPa to 1.66 +/- 0.03 kPa, suggesting values similar to pressure baseline in vivo.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30104 - Pharmacology and pharmacy

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica

  • ISSN

    0001-6837

  • e-ISSN

    2353-5288

  • Svazek periodika

    81

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    5

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    PL - Polská republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    17

  • Strana od-do

    851-867

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001451272900010

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85219403799