Russell's Propositional Functions Viewed as Tichý's Constructions
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F08%3A00029130" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/08:00029130 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Russell's Propositional Functions Viewed as Tichý's Constructions
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In the era of his no-class theory, Russell held that there are no functions in the modern sense and he admitted only individuals, propositions and propositional functions; these were classified by means of his ramified theory of types. This proposal wascriticized in length and many adopted the opinion of Ramsey and Quine that there are only individuals, functions and expressions which were (allegedly wrongly) assumed by Russell as intensional entities. Yet Russell's variables are genuine objects (represented in language by "signs"), Russell did not subscribe to modern paradigm that variables are letters. Consequently, propositional functions cannot be expressions, since expressions cannot contain such variables-letters. I propose to view Russell's propositional functions as Pavel Tichý's constructions, expressions-independent structured procedures (generalized algorithms; for their huge defence see Tichý 1988).
Název v anglickém jazyce
Russell's Propositional Functions Viewed as Tichý's Constructions
Popis výsledku anglicky
In the era of his no-class theory, Russell held that there are no functions in the modern sense and he admitted only individuals, propositions and propositional functions; these were classified by means of his ramified theory of types. This proposal wascriticized in length and many adopted the opinion of Ramsey and Quine that there are only individuals, functions and expressions which were (allegedly wrongly) assumed by Russell as intensional entities. Yet Russell's variables are genuine objects (represented in language by "signs"), Russell did not subscribe to modern paradigm that variables are letters. Consequently, propositional functions cannot be expressions, since expressions cannot contain such variables-letters. I propose to view Russell's propositional functions as Pavel Tichý's constructions, expressions-independent structured procedures (generalized algorithms; for their huge defence see Tichý 1988).
Klasifikace
Druh
O - Ostatní výsledky
CEP obor
AA - Filosofie a náboženství
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GP401%2F07%2FP280" target="_blank" >GP401/07/P280: Singulární termíny - filosofie a logika</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2008
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů