Assessment of response pattern aberrancy in Eysenck Personality Inventory
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F10%3A00049352" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/10:00049352 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Assessment of response pattern aberrancy in Eysenck Personality Inventory
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The presented study deals with two well standardized and relatively powerful indices based on Item Response Theory - z3 and F2 - which we used for detecting aberrant responding in the field of personality assessment. The indices were used on the Neuroticism and Extraversion scales from Eysenck Personality Inventory. The research sample consisted of 427 subjects. Both indices were computed for the whole sample and it was found that they yielded similar results. We selected subjects with the lowest z3 index (highest aberrancy) values and further analyzed their response patterns. Our results suggest that in some cases the inconsistency was caused by faulty or careless responding, but in other cases by discrepancy between the subject?s test behavior (itemresponding) and the theoretical construct being measured.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Assessment of response pattern aberrancy in Eysenck Personality Inventory
Popis výsledku anglicky
The presented study deals with two well standardized and relatively powerful indices based on Item Response Theory - z3 and F2 - which we used for detecting aberrant responding in the field of personality assessment. The indices were used on the Neuroticism and Extraversion scales from Eysenck Personality Inventory. The research sample consisted of 427 subjects. Both indices were computed for the whole sample and it was found that they yielded similar results. We selected subjects with the lowest z3 index (highest aberrancy) values and further analyzed their response patterns. Our results suggest that in some cases the inconsistency was caused by faulty or careless responding, but in other cases by discrepancy between the subject?s test behavior (itemresponding) and the theoretical construct being measured.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AN - Psychologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GP406%2F09%2FP284" target="_blank" >GP406/09/P284: Problematika polytomních IRT modelů v oblasti psychologie osobnosti a jejich implementace do software CATO</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2010
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty brněnské univerzity. Řada psychologická (P). (Studia Minora Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Brunensis. Series psychologica.) Annales psychologici.
ISSN
1211-3522
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
roč. 58
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
P 14
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
—
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—