Identification of player types in ultimatum bargaining games
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F14%3A00076957" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/14:00076957 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Identification of player types in ultimatum bargaining games
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Using cluster analysis I identified three types of players in two versions of the ultimatum bargaining game (with symmetric and with asymmetric information availability). I call the player types Fair players, Moderate opportunists and Hard-nosed opportunists. The player types constitute 23.1%, 43.3% and 33.6%, respectively, of the sample of 134 experimental participants. The types differ only moderately with respect to their choices in the standard ultimatum game. In particular, Hard-nosed opportunistsmake less generous offers than the two other types. However, there are very pronounced differences in behavior in the asymmetric information game. Fair players make fairer offers, misrepresent the surplus less frequently and to a lesser degree than the two other types. Hard-nosed opportunists are in turn less fair and more deceptive than Moderate opportunists in the asymmetric information game.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Identification of player types in ultimatum bargaining games
Popis výsledku anglicky
Using cluster analysis I identified three types of players in two versions of the ultimatum bargaining game (with symmetric and with asymmetric information availability). I call the player types Fair players, Moderate opportunists and Hard-nosed opportunists. The player types constitute 23.1%, 43.3% and 33.6%, respectively, of the sample of 134 experimental participants. The types differ only moderately with respect to their choices in the standard ultimatum game. In particular, Hard-nosed opportunistsmake less generous offers than the two other types. However, there are very pronounced differences in behavior in the asymmetric information game. Fair players make fairer offers, misrepresent the surplus less frequently and to a lesser degree than the two other types. Hard-nosed opportunists are in turn less fair and more deceptive than Moderate opportunists in the asymmetric information game.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
AN - Psychologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Conference Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference Mathematical Methods in Economics
ISBN
9788024442099
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
4
Strana od-do
1074-1077
Název nakladatele
Palacký University
Místo vydání
Olomouc
Místo konání akce
Olomouc
Datum konání akce
1. 1. 2014
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
EUR - Evropská akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—