Crimen Maiestatis and the Poena Legis during the Principate

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F16%3A00089484" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/16:00089484 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.akademiai.com/doi/pdf/10.1556/068.2014.54.4.5" target="_blank" >http://www.akademiai.com/doi/pdf/10.1556/068.2014.54.4.5</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/068.2014.54.4.5" target="_blank" >10.1556/068.2014.54.4.5</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Crimen Maiestatis and the Poena Legis during the Principate

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

It has been argued that during the reign of Roman emperors the crime of lese-majeste was punishable by death, and the arbitrariness of its prosecution has been considered one of the negative aspects of this era. However, the debate on the origin, date and content of the law, which should have formed the frame for all trials - the lex Iulia maiestatis - has not been sufficiently concluded. The paper attempts to prove that it was the aquae et ignis interdictio, i.e. non-voluntary exile, not death, that remained the poena legis during the Principate; death could also be inflicted, but not as the legal penalty. The possibilities of the cognitio extra ordinem, which spread from the beginning of the Principate, and the role of the Senate are duly considered.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Crimen Maiestatis and the Poena Legis during the Principate

Popis výsledku anglicky

It has been argued that during the reign of Roman emperors the crime of lese-majeste was punishable by death, and the arbitrariness of its prosecution has been considered one of the negative aspects of this era. However, the debate on the origin, date and content of the law, which should have formed the frame for all trials - the lex Iulia maiestatis - has not been sufficiently concluded. The paper attempts to prove that it was the aquae et ignis interdictio, i.e. non-voluntary exile, not death, that remained the poena legis during the Principate; death could also be inflicted, but not as the legal penalty. The possibilities of the cognitio extra ordinem, which spread from the beginning of the Principate, and the role of the Senate are duly considered.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AB - Dějiny

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta Antiqua Academiae scientiarum Hungaricae

ISSN

0044-5975

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

54

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

HU - Maďarsko

Počet stran výsledku

24

Strana od-do

407-430

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—