On Comenius’s Approaches to the Biblical Texts in his Manual or Core of the Whole Saint Bible

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F16%3A00092465" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/16:00092465 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/136158" target="_blank" >http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/136158</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

On Comenius’s Approaches to the Biblical Texts in his Manual or Core of the Whole Saint Bible

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The author had originally suggested investigating types of paraphrase in connection with Comenius’s literary theory as contained in his work Zpráva a naučení o kazatelství 2 (1651) as a possible way to research his approaches to the original biblical texts contained in his Manual. Further research has proved this way to be insufficiently effective, as Comenius used the terms paraphrase and periphrase interchangeably; his presented theory in Zpráva a naučení o kazatelství was different from his own literary practice, and, most importantly, Zpráva a naučení o kazatelství was devised in relation to the art of preaching (and not as an excerpt from the Bible, which the Manual in fact is). The illustration of paraphrase that I will present in this paper based on the Manual is, in effect, only a partial and very narrow angle from which Comenius’s methods of approach to biblical texts can be observed. I would like to try to present these methods at least a bit more accurately.

Název v anglickém jazyce

On Comenius’s Approaches to the Biblical Texts in his Manual or Core of the Whole Saint Bible

Popis výsledku anglicky

The author had originally suggested investigating types of paraphrase in connection with Comenius’s literary theory as contained in his work Zpráva a naučení o kazatelství 2 (1651) as a possible way to research his approaches to the original biblical texts contained in his Manual. Further research has proved this way to be insufficiently effective, as Comenius used the terms paraphrase and periphrase interchangeably; his presented theory in Zpráva a naučení o kazatelství was different from his own literary practice, and, most importantly, Zpráva a naučení o kazatelství was devised in relation to the art of preaching (and not as an excerpt from the Bible, which the Manual in fact is). The illustration of paraphrase that I will present in this paper based on the Manual is, in effect, only a partial and very narrow angle from which Comenius’s methods of approach to biblical texts can be observed. I would like to try to present these methods at least a bit more accurately.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AJ - Písemnictví, mas–media, audiovize

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Bohemica litteraria

ISSN

1213-2144

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

19

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

29-39

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—