Founding narratives and chronicles of Žďár (Fons beatae Mariae virginis) and Zbraslav (Aula Regiae): An Attempt to form Cistercian identity in Czech lands?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F19%3A00117212" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/19:00117212 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.citeaux.org/numero-actuel/" target="_blank" >http://www.citeaux.org/numero-actuel/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Founding narratives and chronicles of Žďár (Fons beatae Mariae virginis) and Zbraslav (Aula Regiae): An Attempt to form Cistercian identity in Czech lands?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The aim of this article is to analyze the foundation narratives of two Cistercian chronicles written in Czech lands, the shorter versed Chronicon domus Sarensis (ca. 1300) and the longer prose Chronica Aulae regiae (ca. 1314-1339). Scrutiny of these founding narratives shows that although the geographical scope was different (local society vs. kingdom of Bohemia), they shared basic elements of textual strategy: an intense interest in the founder of the monastery. Instead of looking for a Cistercian context, they—like their Benedictine predecessors—attempted to reinforce the monastery’s position within local networks through links with the lay founder and his family. It also appears that to position the monastery in the Cistercian network and to reinforce Cistercian identity, monasteries in Czech lands primarily used liturgical texts and necrologies.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Founding narratives and chronicles of Žďár (Fons beatae Mariae virginis) and Zbraslav (Aula Regiae): An Attempt to form Cistercian identity in Czech lands?

Popis výsledku anglicky

The aim of this article is to analyze the foundation narratives of two Cistercian chronicles written in Czech lands, the shorter versed Chronicon domus Sarensis (ca. 1300) and the longer prose Chronica Aulae regiae (ca. 1314-1339). Scrutiny of these founding narratives shows that although the geographical scope was different (local society vs. kingdom of Bohemia), they shared basic elements of textual strategy: an intense interest in the founder of the monastery. Instead of looking for a Cistercian context, they—like their Benedictine predecessors—attempted to reinforce the monastery’s position within local networks through links with the lay founder and his family. It also appears that to position the monastery in the Cistercian network and to reinforce Cistercian identity, monasteries in Czech lands primarily used liturgical texts and necrologies.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Cîteaux: Commentarii Cistercienses: Revue d'histoire cistercienne

ISSN

0009-7497

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

70

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3-4

Stát vydavatele periodika

FR - Francouzská republika

Počet stran výsledku

33

Strana od-do

213-245

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85104984031