Founding narratives and chronicles of Žďár (Fons Beatae Mariae Virginis) and Zbraslav (Aula Regia): an attempt to form a Cistercian identity in Czech lands?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17250%2F19%3AA2202CFY" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17250/19:A2202CFY - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.citeaux.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Table-70-1-4.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.citeaux.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Table-70-1-4.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Founding narratives and chronicles of Žďár (Fons Beatae Mariae Virginis) and Zbraslav (Aula Regia): an attempt to form a Cistercian identity in Czech lands?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The aim of this article is to analyze the foundation narratives of two Cistercian chronicles written in Czech lands, the shorter versed Chronicon domus Sarensis (ca. 1300) and the longer prose Chronica Aulae regiae (ca. 1314-1339). Scrutiny of these founding narratives shows that although the geographical scope was different (local society vs. kingdom of Bohemia), they shared basic elements of textual strategy: an intense interest in the founder of the monastery. Instead of looking for a Cistercian context, they—like their Benedictine predecessors—attempted to reinforce the monastery’s position within local networks through links with the lay founder and his family. It also appears that to position the monastery in the Cistercian network and to reinforce Cistercian identity, monasteries in Czech lands primarily used liturgical texts and necrologies.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Founding narratives and chronicles of Žďár (Fons Beatae Mariae Virginis) and Zbraslav (Aula Regia): an attempt to form a Cistercian identity in Czech lands?
Popis výsledku anglicky
The aim of this article is to analyze the foundation narratives of two Cistercian chronicles written in Czech lands, the shorter versed Chronicon domus Sarensis (ca. 1300) and the longer prose Chronica Aulae regiae (ca. 1314-1339). Scrutiny of these founding narratives shows that although the geographical scope was different (local society vs. kingdom of Bohemia), they shared basic elements of textual strategy: an intense interest in the founder of the monastery. Instead of looking for a Cistercian context, they—like their Benedictine predecessors—attempted to reinforce the monastery’s position within local networks through links with the lay founder and his family. It also appears that to position the monastery in the Cistercian network and to reinforce Cistercian identity, monasteries in Czech lands primarily used liturgical texts and necrologies.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Cîteaux: Commentarii Cistercienses: Revue d'histoire cistercienne
ISSN
0009-7497
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
70
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3-4
Stát vydavatele periodika
FR - Francouzská republika
Počet stran výsledku
33
Strana od-do
213-245
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85104984031