Czechoslovak Republic and the Formation of Ethnographic Science during the “First Republic” (1918–1938) – Part II

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F20%3A00122220" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/20:00122220 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.ei.sanu.ac.rs/index.php/gei/article/view/903/801" target="_blank" >http://www.ei.sanu.ac.rs/index.php/gei/article/view/903/801</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/GEI2002379V" target="_blank" >10.2298/GEI2002379V</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Czechoslovak Republic and the Formation of Ethnographic Science during the “First Republic” (1918–1938) – Part II

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Our target is to assess how the Czech and the Slovak ethnography developed in the period of the First Czechoslovak Republic (1918–1938), whether it displayed international connotations, and to what extent it responded to the common European development of this discipline. Research contacts between Slavic ethnographers and geographers influenced one of the ethnographic research lines in Czechoslovakia, and the evidence for this are the application of Jovan Cvijić’s Anthropogeographic School and the application of cultural and geographical research line in interwar Czechoslovakia’s science. Between the world wars, Czechoslovak ethnographers paid attention to Slovakia and to Carpathian Ruthenia, where forms of traditional folk culture still actively lived on. Ethnography in the interwar Czechoslovakia can be considered to be an important part of evolving European ethnology. Unfortunately, this advancement was interrupted by political development after World War II.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Czechoslovak Republic and the Formation of Ethnographic Science during the “First Republic” (1918–1938) – Part II

Popis výsledku anglicky

Our target is to assess how the Czech and the Slovak ethnography developed in the period of the First Czechoslovak Republic (1918–1938), whether it displayed international connotations, and to what extent it responded to the common European development of this discipline. Research contacts between Slavic ethnographers and geographers influenced one of the ethnographic research lines in Czechoslovakia, and the evidence for this are the application of Jovan Cvijić’s Anthropogeographic School and the application of cultural and geographical research line in interwar Czechoslovakia’s science. Between the world wars, Czechoslovak ethnographers paid attention to Slovakia and to Carpathian Ruthenia, where forms of traditional folk culture still actively lived on. Ethnography in the interwar Czechoslovakia can be considered to be an important part of evolving European ethnology. Unfortunately, this advancement was interrupted by political development after World War II.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50404 - Anthropology, ethnology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Glasnik Etnografskog Instituta SANU

ISSN

0350-0861

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

68

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

RS - Srbská republika

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

379-396

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—