Semantic Maps : A Way Out of the Equivalence Conundrum?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F21%3A00135028" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/21:00135028 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/145106" target="_blank" >https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/145106</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Semantic Maps : A Way Out of the Equivalence Conundrum?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Like other constructs within translation studies, the construct known as the unique item crucially depends on a concept of equivalence. However, when defining the unique item as a linguistic unit which lacks a linguistic counterpart in the source language, the propounder of the unique-items hypothesis, Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit, is laconic as to what she means by a linguistic counterpart. Although it has been suggested that one could, in one’s definition, resort to a classical account of translation shifts, a better solution may be discovered in the field of linguistic typology. The present paper illustrates how comparing linguistic items across languages can be achieved with a typological approach based on the semantic-map model. It is shown on the example of indefinite pronouns that semantic maps offer a much more precise way of assessing the degree to which two items from different languages can be said to be equivalent. While semantic maps reveal as much as they conceal, they are developed on the basis of empirical data from numerous languages and can be falsified. They can therefore be considered a valuable asset to translation scholars.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Semantic Maps : A Way Out of the Equivalence Conundrum?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Like other constructs within translation studies, the construct known as the unique item crucially depends on a concept of equivalence. However, when defining the unique item as a linguistic unit which lacks a linguistic counterpart in the source language, the propounder of the unique-items hypothesis, Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit, is laconic as to what she means by a linguistic counterpart. Although it has been suggested that one could, in one’s definition, resort to a classical account of translation shifts, a better solution may be discovered in the field of linguistic typology. The present paper illustrates how comparing linguistic items across languages can be achieved with a typological approach based on the semantic-map model. It is shown on the example of indefinite pronouns that semantic maps offer a much more precise way of assessing the degree to which two items from different languages can be said to be equivalent. While semantic maps reveal as much as they conceal, they are developed on the basis of empirical data from numerous languages and can be falsified. They can therefore be considered a valuable asset to translation scholars.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60203 - Linguistics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Theory and Practice in English Studies

ISSN

1805-0859

e-ISSN

1805-0859

Svazek periodika

10

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

7-21

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—