Hegel’s Hermeneutics and Intellectual Humility

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F23%3A00130217" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/23:00130217 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://distinctio.net/index.php/home/article/view/19" target="_blank" >https://distinctio.net/index.php/home/article/view/19</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.56550/d.1.2.5" target="_blank" >10.56550/d.1.2.5</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Hegel’s Hermeneutics and Intellectual Humility

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

I argue that Hegel uses two distinct approaches to hermeneutics in his works, viz. the assimilative and the reconstructive approach. I characterize them, explain why Hegel uses both and focus on their presuppositions. In the light of these reflections, I address the alleged contradiction between Hegel’s reflections on interpretation and their application. Contrary to some literature, I argue that Hegel’s hermeneutical practice does not deviate from his theoretical approach to interpretation. Then I focus on the issue whether and to which extent these two approaches are intellectually humble practices. I argue that only the reconstructive approach advanced in the Phenomenology is intellectually humble in contrast to the assimilative approach advanced in Hegel’s Lectures.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Hegel’s Hermeneutics and Intellectual Humility

Popis výsledku anglicky

I argue that Hegel uses two distinct approaches to hermeneutics in his works, viz. the assimilative and the reconstructive approach. I characterize them, explain why Hegel uses both and focus on their presuppositions. In the light of these reflections, I address the alleged contradiction between Hegel’s reflections on interpretation and their application. Contrary to some literature, I argue that Hegel’s hermeneutical practice does not deviate from his theoretical approach to interpretation. Then I focus on the issue whether and to which extent these two approaches are intellectually humble practices. I argue that only the reconstructive approach advanced in the Phenomenology is intellectually humble in contrast to the assimilative approach advanced in Hegel’s Lectures.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Distinctio

ISSN

2939-0826

e-ISSN

2939-2764

Svazek periodika

1

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

HR - Chorvatská republika

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

105-123

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—