Khazar Khaganate in the realms of Soviet academia : From M. I. Artamonov to L. N. Gumilev and Russian nationalists

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F23%3A00130774" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/23:00130774 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://observare.autonoma.pt/janus-net/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/05/vol14-n1.html" target="_blank" >https://observare.autonoma.pt/janus-net/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/05/vol14-n1.html</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.14.1.1" target="_blank" >10.26619/1647-7251.14.1.1</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Khazar Khaganate in the realms of Soviet academia : From M. I. Artamonov to L. N. Gumilev and Russian nationalists

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper deals with the reception of M. I. Artamonov's (1898–1972) and L. N. Gumilev's (1912–1992) works focused on the history of Khazar Khaganate and their position in the context of Soviet academia. The paper is based on the prosographical approach to the topic and comparative analysis of primary texts published by Gumilev and Artamonov, mainly in the 1960s and 1970s. The main aim of the study is to analyze and reflect on their findings in the broader context of the Soviet academic discourse and intellectual milieu of Russian nationalists. I argue that Gumilev’s radical revision of the history of Khazar Khaganate far exceeded previous Artamonov’s findings and attracted the attention of Russian nationalist groups of the post-Stalinist era mainly due to its antisemitic narrative. Furthermore, despite the ever-present ambivalence of Gumilev’s contact with Russian nationalists during the 1970s, he was heavily affected by the unstable relationship between Russian nationalists and the official Soviet regime. During that time, Gumilev faced strong censorship of his texts, and his most radical revisionist study focused on the Khazaria was eventually published only posthumously in 1993.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Khazar Khaganate in the realms of Soviet academia : From M. I. Artamonov to L. N. Gumilev and Russian nationalists

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper deals with the reception of M. I. Artamonov's (1898–1972) and L. N. Gumilev's (1912–1992) works focused on the history of Khazar Khaganate and their position in the context of Soviet academia. The paper is based on the prosographical approach to the topic and comparative analysis of primary texts published by Gumilev and Artamonov, mainly in the 1960s and 1970s. The main aim of the study is to analyze and reflect on their findings in the broader context of the Soviet academic discourse and intellectual milieu of Russian nationalists. I argue that Gumilev’s radical revision of the history of Khazar Khaganate far exceeded previous Artamonov’s findings and attracted the attention of Russian nationalist groups of the post-Stalinist era mainly due to its antisemitic narrative. Furthermore, despite the ever-present ambivalence of Gumilev’s contact with Russian nationalists during the 1970s, he was heavily affected by the unstable relationship between Russian nationalists and the official Soviet regime. During that time, Gumilev faced strong censorship of his texts, and his most radical revisionist study focused on the Khazaria was eventually published only posthumously in 1993.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Janus.Net: e-Journal of International Relations

ISSN

1647-7251

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

14

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

PT - Portugalská republika

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

1-16

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85164613294