“Habsburg Scholars and Writings about Romanian Historical Monuments in the Late Nineteenth Century”
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F24%3A00139569" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/24:00139569 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14361/9783839473634-003" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.14361/9783839473634-003</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14361/9783839473634-003" target="_blank" >10.14361/9783839473634-003</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
“Habsburg Scholars and Writings about Romanian Historical Monuments in the Late Nineteenth Century”
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
As policies and institutions for the preservation and study of historical monuments developed in the Habsburg Empire, writings and documentary trips also focused on the lesser-known regions of the Empire’s southeastern border- lands. Architects, ethnographers and historians attempted to explain and promote what they perceived as fascinating monuments, traditions or artefacts of the Romanian, Serbian, Ukrainian or other communities. This chapter looks at these attempts in the writings of several Habsburg scholars about architectural monuments in the region of Bukovina and the neighboring nation-state of Romania. It compares them and also looks at their connection with the work of scholars from Romania to assess the extent to which Habsburg scholars responded to or were influenced by the political context created from the emergence of the new nation-state. Key to the chapter is the shared history and therefore the same type of fifteenth to seventeenth century monuments in Bukovina and in Romania’s region of Moldavia. The shared heritage forced scholars to consider a wider regional context in their analysis, to interact across borders and write studies that balanced the Habsburg policies of promoting regional identities with a recognition of the shared cultural and architectural heritage of Bukovina and Romania. Finally, the chapter finishes with a brief overview of studies about other regions in the southeastern Habsburg borderlands, Hungary, Dalmatia and the nation-state of Serbia, in order to emphasize common scholarly practices beyond regions or nation-states.
Název v anglickém jazyce
“Habsburg Scholars and Writings about Romanian Historical Monuments in the Late Nineteenth Century”
Popis výsledku anglicky
As policies and institutions for the preservation and study of historical monuments developed in the Habsburg Empire, writings and documentary trips also focused on the lesser-known regions of the Empire’s southeastern border- lands. Architects, ethnographers and historians attempted to explain and promote what they perceived as fascinating monuments, traditions or artefacts of the Romanian, Serbian, Ukrainian or other communities. This chapter looks at these attempts in the writings of several Habsburg scholars about architectural monuments in the region of Bukovina and the neighboring nation-state of Romania. It compares them and also looks at their connection with the work of scholars from Romania to assess the extent to which Habsburg scholars responded to or were influenced by the political context created from the emergence of the new nation-state. Key to the chapter is the shared history and therefore the same type of fifteenth to seventeenth century monuments in Bukovina and in Romania’s region of Moldavia. The shared heritage forced scholars to consider a wider regional context in their analysis, to interact across borders and write studies that balanced the Habsburg policies of promoting regional identities with a recognition of the shared cultural and architectural heritage of Bukovina and Romania. Finally, the chapter finishes with a brief overview of studies about other regions in the southeastern Habsburg borderlands, Hungary, Dalmatia and the nation-state of Serbia, in order to emphasize common scholarly practices beyond regions or nation-states.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60401 - Arts, Art history
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GN22-19492I" target="_blank" >GN22-19492I: První dějiny architektury a tvorba národního dědictví v jihovýchodní Evropě (1860-1930). Nadnárodní přístup</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
East Central European Art Histories and Austria : Imperial Pasts – Neoliberal Presences – Decolonial Futures
ISBN
9783837673630
Počet stran výsledku
26
Strana od-do
39-64
Počet stran knihy
418
Název nakladatele
Transcript
Místo vydání
Bielefeld
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—