Arbitration clause as unfair contract term from the perspective of Czech and EC law
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F08%3A00035170" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/08:00035170 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216224:14220/08:00051128
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Arbitration clause as unfair contract term from the perspective of Czech and EC law
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The paper presented at the conference in Turin deals, in general terms, with the relationship between consumer protection in the EU and arbitration as a mechanism of dispute resolution. Second, the ECJ Claro case is examined with particular emphasis on the influence of this case on Czech law. Also, paper reminds us that the Directive on unfair contract terms has not been still correctly implemented into Czech law. This is due to the fact that the Czech consumers have to claim invalidity of arbitration clause as unfair contract term, for the Czech Civil Code lays down so called relative invalidity of unfair contract term. What is more, the section 33 of the Czech Arbitration Act seems to be at variance with the Claro decision as well as with the article6 of the Directive on unfair contract terms.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Arbitration clause as unfair contract term from the perspective of Czech and EC law
Popis výsledku anglicky
The paper presented at the conference in Turin deals, in general terms, with the relationship between consumer protection in the EU and arbitration as a mechanism of dispute resolution. Second, the ECJ Claro case is examined with particular emphasis on the influence of this case on Czech law. Also, paper reminds us that the Directive on unfair contract terms has not been still correctly implemented into Czech law. This is due to the fact that the Czech consumers have to claim invalidity of arbitration clause as unfair contract term, for the Czech Civil Code lays down so called relative invalidity of unfair contract term. What is more, the section 33 of the Czech Arbitration Act seems to be at variance with the Claro decision as well as with the article6 of the Directive on unfair contract terms.
Klasifikace
Druh
O - Ostatní výsledky
CEP obor
AG - Právní vědy
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2008
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů