Arbitration clause as unfair contract term from the perspective of Czech and EC law

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F08%3A00035170" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/08:00035170 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14220/08:00051128

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Arbitration clause as unfair contract term from the perspective of Czech and EC law

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper presented at the conference in Turin deals, in general terms, with the relationship between consumer protection in the EU and arbitration as a mechanism of dispute resolution. Second, the ECJ Claro case is examined with particular emphasis on the influence of this case on Czech law. Also, paper reminds us that the Directive on unfair contract terms has not been still correctly implemented into Czech law. This is due to the fact that the Czech consumers have to claim invalidity of arbitration clause as unfair contract term, for the Czech Civil Code lays down so called relative invalidity of unfair contract term. What is more, the section 33 of the Czech Arbitration Act seems to be at variance with the Claro decision as well as with the article6 of the Directive on unfair contract terms.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Arbitration clause as unfair contract term from the perspective of Czech and EC law

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper presented at the conference in Turin deals, in general terms, with the relationship between consumer protection in the EU and arbitration as a mechanism of dispute resolution. Second, the ECJ Claro case is examined with particular emphasis on the influence of this case on Czech law. Also, paper reminds us that the Directive on unfair contract terms has not been still correctly implemented into Czech law. This is due to the fact that the Czech consumers have to claim invalidity of arbitration clause as unfair contract term, for the Czech Civil Code lays down so called relative invalidity of unfair contract term. What is more, the section 33 of the Czech Arbitration Act seems to be at variance with the Claro decision as well as with the article6 of the Directive on unfair contract terms.

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2008

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů