A Couple of Notes Regarding a Controversial Finding by the Czech Constitutional Court (Case Melčák)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F10%3A00045310" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/10:00045310 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A Couple of Notes Regarding a Controversial Finding by the Czech Constitutional Court (Case Melčák)

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In September 2009, the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic issued one of its controversial findings that became the main subject of discussion of both the broad public and politicians and layers in the Czech Republic and abroad. Even the Constitutional Court itself considers this finding to be of significant importance and the Court even had it translated into English and German and put it on web. Therefore I decided to summarize this finding and submit it to foreign readers in more understandable form. Notwithstanding that this finding (decision) ÚS Pl. ÚS 24/09 was come to by outstanding majority of Justices (thirteen voted in favor of it), one might look at it as one of the most controversial decision made by the constitutional tribunal so far.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A Couple of Notes Regarding a Controversial Finding by the Czech Constitutional Court (Case Melčák)

Popis výsledku anglicky

In September 2009, the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic issued one of its controversial findings that became the main subject of discussion of both the broad public and politicians and layers in the Czech Republic and abroad. Even the Constitutional Court itself considers this finding to be of significant importance and the Court even had it translated into English and German and put it on web. Therefore I decided to summarize this finding and submit it to foreign readers in more understandable form. Notwithstanding that this finding (decision) ÚS Pl. ÚS 24/09 was come to by outstanding majority of Justices (thirteen voted in favor of it), one might look at it as one of the most controversial decision made by the constitutional tribunal so far.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2010

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal on Legal and Economic Issues of Central Europe

ISSN

2043-085X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

Vol. 1

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

No. 2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

2

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—