The contribution of the Court of Justice to the harmonisation of copyright law in the European Union

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F12%3A00082062" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/12:00082062 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12027-012-0264-x" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12027-012-0264-x</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12027-012-0264-x" target="_blank" >10.1007/s12027-012-0264-x</a>

Jazyk výsledku

francouzština

Název v původním jazyce

La contribution de la Cour de justice a l?harmonisation du droit d?auteur dans l?Union Européenne

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The Grand Chamber's Promusicae judgment in 2008 gave the Court an opportunity to weigh and balance the right to intellectual property and other fundamental rights intervening in this domain. In this case, the Court, in accordance with its approach in theSchmidberger ruling, leaves it to Member States to weigh up those rights in order to find a fair balance. In substance, the "'Schmidberger" approach was applied to the protection of intellectual property, despite the lack of any fundamental freedom or any reference to public interest. There is also often a need to balance different interests within the sole framework of the fundamental right to intellectual property. In this respect, the Court supports basically a broad concept of copyright which is reflected in a wide interpretation of the notions of "work", of the "communication to the public" and of the "remuneration" to be paid to the author.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The contribution of the Court of Justice to the harmonisation of copyright law in the European Union

Popis výsledku anglicky

The Grand Chamber's Promusicae judgment in 2008 gave the Court an opportunity to weigh and balance the right to intellectual property and other fundamental rights intervening in this domain. In this case, the Court, in accordance with its approach in theSchmidberger ruling, leaves it to Member States to weigh up those rights in order to find a fair balance. In substance, the "'Schmidberger" approach was applied to the protection of intellectual property, despite the lack of any fundamental freedom or any reference to public interest. There is also often a need to balance different interests within the sole framework of the fundamental right to intellectual property. In this respect, the Court supports basically a broad concept of copyright which is reflected in a wide interpretation of the notions of "work", of the "communication to the public" and of the "remuneration" to be paid to the author.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

ERA Forum: scripta iuris Europaei; journal of the Academy of European Law (Europäische Rechtsakademie Trier)

ISSN

1612-3093

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

13

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

411-422

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—