A procedural approach to the public interest in migration control

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F23%3A73622790" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/23:73622790 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://blr.flaw.uniba.sk/index.php/BLR/article/view/744/557" target="_blank" >https://blr.flaw.uniba.sk/index.php/BLR/article/view/744/557</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.744" target="_blank" >10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.744</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A procedural approach to the public interest in migration control

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The research explores the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) application of Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) when engaging the public interest in migration control. It explains the current case law of the Court and examines when the public interest in migration control can be applied as a legitimate aim. The research is questioning whether the public interest in controlling migration can be used as a legitimate aim when an interference of the right to family life has been established and whether the public interest in migration control should be seen as a static factor. The study claims that the Court’s unclear way of distinguishing between positive and negative obligations and its lack of assessing the public interests when balancing the personal interests against the public interests in controlling migration makes the case law inconsistent and unclear. In order to make the case law more consistent the research suggests that the Court should use a procedural approach like in cases where the State’s interest in public safety is engaged.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A procedural approach to the public interest in migration control

Popis výsledku anglicky

The research explores the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) application of Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) when engaging the public interest in migration control. It explains the current case law of the Court and examines when the public interest in migration control can be applied as a legitimate aim. The research is questioning whether the public interest in controlling migration can be used as a legitimate aim when an interference of the right to family life has been established and whether the public interest in migration control should be seen as a static factor. The study claims that the Court’s unclear way of distinguishing between positive and negative obligations and its lack of assessing the public interests when balancing the personal interests against the public interests in controlling migration makes the case law inconsistent and unclear. In order to make the case law more consistent the research suggests that the Court should use a procedural approach like in cases where the State’s interest in public safety is engaged.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Bratislava Law Review

ISSN

2585-7088

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2023

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

SK - Slovenská republika

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

59-72

Kód UT WoS článku

001163702100003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—