The Uncertain Place of the Child’s Best Interests in ECtHR’s Immigration Case Law

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F20%3A73605965" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/20:73605965 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/iclr-2020-0019" target="_blank" >https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/iclr-2020-0019</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Uncertain Place of the Child’s Best Interests in ECtHR’s Immigration Case Law

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

It has been highlighted that in the area of immigration law the protection offered by the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) to children and family life is arguably at its weakest. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) immigration case law on Article 8 ECHR has shown an uneven and uncertain application of the child’s best interests. Little significance is attached to the child’s respect for family life when determining whether the immigration measure is compatible with the ECHR. This paper will explore how the Court is identifying the best interests of the child and analyse what weight the Court apportions to the best interests of the child when balancing the state’s and the applicant’s interests. It will also examine whether the Court prioritize migration control over the child’s best interests in cases where both family matters and immigration matters are involved.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Uncertain Place of the Child’s Best Interests in ECtHR’s Immigration Case Law

Popis výsledku anglicky

It has been highlighted that in the area of immigration law the protection offered by the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) to children and family life is arguably at its weakest. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) immigration case law on Article 8 ECHR has shown an uneven and uncertain application of the child’s best interests. Little significance is attached to the child’s respect for family life when determining whether the immigration measure is compatible with the ECHR. This paper will explore how the Court is identifying the best interests of the child and analyse what weight the Court apportions to the best interests of the child when balancing the state’s and the applicant’s interests. It will also examine whether the Court prioritize migration control over the child’s best interests in cases where both family matters and immigration matters are involved.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International and Comparative Law Review

ISSN

1213-8770

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2020

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

93-112

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85101643685