A Migrants’ Right to Respect for Family Life - The Problematic Developments of the European Court of Human Right’s Case Law

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F21%3A73611736" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/21:73611736 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.sciendo.com/article/10.2478/iclr-2021-0021" target="_blank" >https://www.sciendo.com/article/10.2478/iclr-2021-0021</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0021" target="_blank" >10.2478/iclr-2021-0021</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A Migrants’ Right to Respect for Family Life - The Problematic Developments of the European Court of Human Right’s Case Law

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper analyses the inconsistency in the case law of the European Court of human Rights when applying Article 8, the right to respect for family life, of the European Convention of Human Rights in the immigration context. Even though Article 8 has permeated the area of immigration policy, critics claim that the case law has shown a number of extremely problematic developments. The main question of the paper is how the Court can be more consistent when determining a States’ compliance with Article 8. It examines whether the use of the same compliance test for all immigration cases could offer a more structured framework. The paper also explores additional adjustments in the application of Article 8 in order to improve the current development of the inconsistent case law.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A Migrants’ Right to Respect for Family Life - The Problematic Developments of the European Court of Human Right’s Case Law

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper analyses the inconsistency in the case law of the European Court of human Rights when applying Article 8, the right to respect for family life, of the European Convention of Human Rights in the immigration context. Even though Article 8 has permeated the area of immigration policy, critics claim that the case law has shown a number of extremely problematic developments. The main question of the paper is how the Court can be more consistent when determining a States’ compliance with Article 8. It examines whether the use of the same compliance test for all immigration cases could offer a more structured framework. The paper also explores additional adjustments in the application of Article 8 in order to improve the current development of the inconsistent case law.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International and Comparative Law Review

ISSN

1213-8770

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

21

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

116-137

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85127864285