The Principle of Self-determination and Rights of National Minorities. A Legal and Philosophical Analysis of the Problem Using an Example from the Czech Republic
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F14%3A00078809" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/14:00078809 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The Principle of Self-determination and Rights of National Minorities. A Legal and Philosophical Analysis of the Problem Using an Example from the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The principle of self-determination in international law is considered a fundamental principle of legal protection of minorities. Combination of the principle of self-determination with the national principle interconnects policy and law as two autonomous social systems. In our interpretation, we will focus on what structural changes the principle of self-determination in the legal system initiates. For better understanding of our interpretation, we will start from the argumentation and interpretation of a specific case that occurred in the Czech Republic. This concerns the case "D.H. and others versus the Czech Republic? from 1999. We will attempt to show how the principle of self-determination as a legal principle is vague in nature, and its application may lead to uncertainty. In the second part, we will ask whether the principle of self-determination provides sufficient normative reasons for differentiating the majority and minority.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The Principle of Self-determination and Rights of National Minorities. A Legal and Philosophical Analysis of the Problem Using an Example from the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku anglicky
The principle of self-determination in international law is considered a fundamental principle of legal protection of minorities. Combination of the principle of self-determination with the national principle interconnects policy and law as two autonomous social systems. In our interpretation, we will focus on what structural changes the principle of self-determination in the legal system initiates. For better understanding of our interpretation, we will start from the argumentation and interpretation of a specific case that occurred in the Czech Republic. This concerns the case "D.H. and others versus the Czech Republic? from 1999. We will attempt to show how the principle of self-determination as a legal principle is vague in nature, and its application may lead to uncertainty. In the second part, we will ask whether the principle of self-determination provides sufficient normative reasons for differentiating the majority and minority.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
AG - Právní vědy
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
Towards Recognition of Minority Groups. Legal and Communication Strategies
ISBN
9781472444905
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
173-187
Počet stran knihy
273
Název nakladatele
Ashgate Publishing Limited
Místo vydání
Farnham England
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—