Extension of Arbitration Clauses over Non-signatories

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F15%3A00101993" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/15:00101993 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/cofola-international/cofola2015.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/cofola-international/cofola2015.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Extension of Arbitration Clauses over Non-signatories

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Consent, the final frontier. International commercial arbitration is deemed to be a dispute resolution mechanism embedded in consent of the parties involved. Presentation of such a mutual understanding is done through an arbitration agreement. Therefore, it is often quoted that the arbitration is a creature of such a contract. However, the aim of this paper is to analyse whether its contractual, indeed consensual, nature is the only element which the courts use to identify the subjects who may compel or must be compelled to arbitrate disputes, or whether they employ other considerations as well. The paper will focus mainly on extension doctrines less known even to a professional audience assignment, piercing of the corporate veil, estoppel &amp; group of companies. A review of a selected case law and expert opinions leads to a conclusion that consent-finding analyst's is definitely a starting point of any analysis. However, at the same time courts and arbitrators do indeed use tools of contract interpretation and the ones based on equity or good faith considerations to establish, and exceptionally force, the implication of consent far beyond what is obvious.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Extension of Arbitration Clauses over Non-signatories

Popis výsledku anglicky

Consent, the final frontier. International commercial arbitration is deemed to be a dispute resolution mechanism embedded in consent of the parties involved. Presentation of such a mutual understanding is done through an arbitration agreement. Therefore, it is often quoted that the arbitration is a creature of such a contract. However, the aim of this paper is to analyse whether its contractual, indeed consensual, nature is the only element which the courts use to identify the subjects who may compel or must be compelled to arbitrate disputes, or whether they employ other considerations as well. The paper will focus mainly on extension doctrines less known even to a professional audience assignment, piercing of the corporate veil, estoppel &amp; group of companies. A review of a selected case law and expert opinions leads to a conclusion that consent-finding analyst's is definitely a starting point of any analysis. However, at the same time courts and arbitrators do indeed use tools of contract interpretation and the ones based on equity or good faith considerations to establish, and exceptionally force, the implication of consent far beyond what is obvious.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Cofola International 2015: Current challenges to resolution of international (cross-border) disputes

ISBN

9788021080201

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

17-35

Název nakladatele

Masarykova univerzita, Právnická fakulta

Místo vydání

Brno

Místo konání akce

Lednice

Datum konání akce

1. 1. 2015

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000449123200001