NON-SIGNATORIES IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: CONTESTING THE MYTH OF CONSENT

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F18%3A73593115" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/18:73593115 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2018-0038" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2018-0038</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2018-0038" target="_blank" >10.2478/iclr-2018-0038</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

NON-SIGNATORIES IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: CONTESTING THE MYTH OF CONSENT

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Consent, the final frontier. International commercial arbitration is a dispute resolution mechanism embedded in consent of the parties involved. Presentation of such a mutual understanding is done through an arbitration agreement. However, the aim of this paper is to analyse whether its contractual, indeed consensual, nature is the only element which the courts use to identify the subjects who may compel or must be compelled to arbitrate disputes, or whether they employ other considerations as well. The paper will focus on extension doctrines which might be less known even to a professional audience: piercing of the corporate veil, estoppel &amp; group of companies. A review of selected case law leads to a conclusion that consent-finding analysis is definitely a starting point of any analysis. However, at the same time courts and arbitrators do indeed use tools of contract interpretation and the ones based on equity or good faith considerations to establish, and exceptionally force, the implication of consent far beyond what is obvious.

Název v anglickém jazyce

NON-SIGNATORIES IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: CONTESTING THE MYTH OF CONSENT

Popis výsledku anglicky

Consent, the final frontier. International commercial arbitration is a dispute resolution mechanism embedded in consent of the parties involved. Presentation of such a mutual understanding is done through an arbitration agreement. However, the aim of this paper is to analyse whether its contractual, indeed consensual, nature is the only element which the courts use to identify the subjects who may compel or must be compelled to arbitrate disputes, or whether they employ other considerations as well. The paper will focus on extension doctrines which might be less known even to a professional audience: piercing of the corporate veil, estoppel &amp; group of companies. A review of selected case law leads to a conclusion that consent-finding analysis is definitely a starting point of any analysis. However, at the same time courts and arbitrators do indeed use tools of contract interpretation and the ones based on equity or good faith considerations to establish, and exceptionally force, the implication of consent far beyond what is obvious.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International and Comparative Law Review

ISSN

1213-8770

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2018

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

26

Strana od-do

59-84

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—