Lis Pendens Before National and Arbitration Courts

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F17%3A00096585" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/17:00096585 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.universitypublications.net/ijmt/0601/pdf/R6ME390.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.universitypublications.net/ijmt/0601/pdf/R6ME390.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Lis Pendens Before National and Arbitration Courts

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Lis pendens is one way of dealing with the problem of parallel proceedings which are held before national courts or arbitration courts. The lis pendens principle stays that the jurisdiction is kept by the institution which is the first seized of the proceeding involving the same cause of action between the same parties. But, in international civil procedure this rule is not so absolute. It is because of specific relationship between state courts and arbitration. On one side, the arbitration tribunals have the authority to decide on their competence but, on the other side, the state courts have the authority to exercise a control over the validity of arbitration agreement. It is possible that both (state courts and arbitrators) could be competent to hear and decide the dispute. The aim of this article is to analyze the problem of lis pendens between arbitration and state courts.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Lis Pendens Before National and Arbitration Courts

Popis výsledku anglicky

Lis pendens is one way of dealing with the problem of parallel proceedings which are held before national courts or arbitration courts. The lis pendens principle stays that the jurisdiction is kept by the institution which is the first seized of the proceeding involving the same cause of action between the same parties. But, in international civil procedure this rule is not so absolute. It is because of specific relationship between state courts and arbitration. On one side, the arbitration tribunals have the authority to decide on their competence but, on the other side, the state courts have the authority to exercise a control over the validity of arbitration agreement. It is possible that both (state courts and arbitrators) could be competent to hear and decide the dispute. The aim of this article is to analyze the problem of lis pendens between arbitration and state courts.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Thought

ISSN

2156-6992

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

6

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

IT - Italská republika

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

291-299

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—