Lis Pendens between Internatioanl Investment Tribunals and National Courts

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F17%3A00100748" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/17:00100748 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Lis Pendens between Internatioanl Investment Tribunals and National Courts

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper addresses lis pendens between international investment arbitration tribunals and national courts in case of factually and legally related disputes. After giving an overview of the role of lis pendens in national law, it focuses on the analysis of its position in public international law. Afterwards, the paper specifically turns to parallel proceedings in international investment arbitration, in particular those pending simultaneously before arbitrators and in national courts. Thereafter, it is submitted that the principle of abuse of process, often invoked as a corrective tool for lis pendens, does not actually off er a reliable solution or mitigation thereto. Finally, the paper suggests that a solution to the problem of lis pendens between an investment tribunal and national court might not be resolved by international law, but national law. Although this solution does not provide a unity, it is realistic. © 2017, Czech Society of International Law. All rights reserved.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Lis Pendens between Internatioanl Investment Tribunals and National Courts

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper addresses lis pendens between international investment arbitration tribunals and national courts in case of factually and legally related disputes. After giving an overview of the role of lis pendens in national law, it focuses on the analysis of its position in public international law. Afterwards, the paper specifically turns to parallel proceedings in international investment arbitration, in particular those pending simultaneously before arbitrators and in national courts. Thereafter, it is submitted that the principle of abuse of process, often invoked as a corrective tool for lis pendens, does not actually off er a reliable solution or mitigation thereto. Finally, the paper suggests that a solution to the problem of lis pendens between an investment tribunal and national court might not be resolved by international law, but national law. Although this solution does not provide a unity, it is realistic. © 2017, Czech Society of International Law. All rights reserved.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA15-08182S" target="_blank" >GA15-08182S: Role veřejného zájmu v mezinárodní obchodní a investiční arbitráži</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Česká ročenka mezinárodního práva veřejného a soukroméno

ISSN

1805-0565

e-ISSN

1805-0999

Svazek periodika

8

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

Neuveden

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

515-528

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85041090319