Is Separation of Powers a Useless Concept? Part II: Tripartite System Criticism and Application Problems

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F19%3A00111884" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/19:00111884 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://ppuam.amu.edu.pl/uploads/PPUAM%20vol.%209/14_Hapla.pdf" target="_blank" >http://ppuam.amu.edu.pl/uploads/PPUAM%20vol.%209/14_Hapla.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Is Separation of Powers a Useless Concept? Part II: Tripartite System Criticism and Application Problems

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In this paper, the author raised the question of whether the separation of powers is a useless concept. It summarizes some critical arguments against the tripartite separation of powers. The paper deals with application issues related to the separation of powers and distinguishes several attitudes toward them, which it then analyses in more detail. Great attention is dedicated to formalism and functionalism. eventually, the author wonders whether it would be better to innovate the idea of separation of powers, or to dismiss and replace it with some other principle. He concludes that the separation of powers has problems, but we need to evaluate this idea in relation to its possible alternatives. In such a light it still sounds promising.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Is Separation of Powers a Useless Concept? Part II: Tripartite System Criticism and Application Problems

Popis výsledku anglicky

In this paper, the author raised the question of whether the separation of powers is a useless concept. It summarizes some critical arguments against the tripartite separation of powers. The paper deals with application issues related to the separation of powers and distinguishes several attitudes toward them, which it then analyses in more detail. Great attention is dedicated to formalism and functionalism. eventually, the author wonders whether it would be better to innovate the idea of separation of powers, or to dismiss and replace it with some other principle. He concludes that the separation of powers has problems, but we need to evaluate this idea in relation to its possible alternatives. In such a light it still sounds promising.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review

ISSN

2083-9782

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

9

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

211-224

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—