Has The ‘War On Terror’ Put Due Process On The Stand? Why The ECJ's Approach In Kadi II Should Be Used Across The Atlantic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F19%3A00117204" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/19:00117204 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.lub.lu.se/njel/article/view/20369/18316" target="_blank" >https://journals.lub.lu.se/njel/article/view/20369/18316</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.36969/njel.v2i2.20369" target="_blank" >10.36969/njel.v2i2.20369</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Has The ‘War On Terror’ Put Due Process On The Stand? Why The ECJ's Approach In Kadi II Should Be Used Across The Atlantic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) struck a balance between due process rights and national security in the Kadi II case. Applying the ECJ’s analysis to a case recently decided by the D.C. District Court – the Zaidan case – illustrates that a more rights-protective approach can be attained in US courts too. First, this article will explore due process in Europe via the four different versions of the Kadi case. Then, it will take an in-depth look at the Zaidan case. The article concludes by arguing that the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals should adopt a stance on due process similar to that taken by the ECJ in the Kadi II case – which served to uphold the rule of law in Europe by making the actions of public officials reviewable before EU courts in the counter-terrorism context. By exercising a more ‘muscular’ attitude towards the other branches of government’s counter-terrorism measures, the US judiciary might use this case to start a new line of precedent distinct from prior US cases with respect to US citizens’ constitutional rights in the post 9/11 counter-terrorism paradigm.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Has The ‘War On Terror’ Put Due Process On The Stand? Why The ECJ's Approach In Kadi II Should Be Used Across The Atlantic

Popis výsledku anglicky

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) struck a balance between due process rights and national security in the Kadi II case. Applying the ECJ’s analysis to a case recently decided by the D.C. District Court – the Zaidan case – illustrates that a more rights-protective approach can be attained in US courts too. First, this article will explore due process in Europe via the four different versions of the Kadi case. Then, it will take an in-depth look at the Zaidan case. The article concludes by arguing that the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals should adopt a stance on due process similar to that taken by the ECJ in the Kadi II case – which served to uphold the rule of law in Europe by making the actions of public officials reviewable before EU courts in the counter-terrorism context. By exercising a more ‘muscular’ attitude towards the other branches of government’s counter-terrorism measures, the US judiciary might use this case to start a new line of precedent distinct from prior US cases with respect to US citizens’ constitutional rights in the post 9/11 counter-terrorism paradigm.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Nordic Journal of European Law

ISSN

2003-1785

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

SE - Švédské království

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

56-68

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—