DialogUE: Follow-up Judicial Decisions of Czech Apex Courts after the ECJ‘s Preliminary Rulings

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F22%3A00126590" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/22:00126590 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

DialogUE: Follow-up Judicial Decisions of Czech Apex Courts after the ECJ‘s Preliminary Rulings

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper is the first one in a series of articles about the participation of Czech and Slovak courts in the preliminary ruling mechanism - the work is done within the framework of a three-year project called DialogUE funded by the Czech Grant Agency. In this paper, the authors will provide an overview and an analysis of all cases submitted to the ECJ by Czech apex courts, i.e. by the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court. In each case, our aim is to analyse: 1. the quality of the reference by the national court, 2. the suitability and usefulness of the ECJ's answer, and 3. the quality and persuasiveness of the national court's follow-up ruling which transposes the ECJ's answer into the case at hand, and thus into the domestic legal order. The focus of our research is on the last - third - stage of the process, especially since national follow-up rulings are often unknown to the EU law community due to their unavailability in other than the national language.

Název v anglickém jazyce

DialogUE: Follow-up Judicial Decisions of Czech Apex Courts after the ECJ‘s Preliminary Rulings

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper is the first one in a series of articles about the participation of Czech and Slovak courts in the preliminary ruling mechanism - the work is done within the framework of a three-year project called DialogUE funded by the Czech Grant Agency. In this paper, the authors will provide an overview and an analysis of all cases submitted to the ECJ by Czech apex courts, i.e. by the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court. In each case, our aim is to analyse: 1. the quality of the reference by the national court, 2. the suitability and usefulness of the ECJ's answer, and 3. the quality and persuasiveness of the national court's follow-up ruling which transposes the ECJ's answer into the case at hand, and thus into the domestic legal order. The focus of our research is on the last - third - stage of the process, especially since national follow-up rulings are often unknown to the EU law community due to their unavailability in other than the national language.

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50500 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA22-21872S" target="_blank" >GA22-21872S: Justiční dialog v evropských věcech: příklad ČR a SR</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů