Subjects' Relevance Within an AI-included Creative Process

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F19%3A00120461" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/19:00120461 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/services/login.html?targetPage=http://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/issues/2019/IRIS/subjects--relevance-_10375559a0.html__ONCE&handle=http://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/issues/2019/IRIS/subjects--relevance-_10375559a0.html__ONCE" target="_blank" >https://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/services/login.html?targetPage=http://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/issues/2019/IRIS/subjects--relevance-_10375559a0.html__ONCE&handle=http://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/issues/2019/IRIS/subjects--relevance-_10375559a0.html__ONCE</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Subjects' Relevance Within an AI-included Creative Process

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Speaking of the works created by or using artificial intelligence (AI) either in form of specialized software (as the portrait of Edmond Belamy) or an interactive platform (as the DeepArt’s or Humtap’s outcomes), there is an indisputable role of humans. Within such an AI-included creative process, we can find a lot of subjects interacting with an AI, either as (i) the author of an AI per se, (ii) the authors of all the datasets used for creating a basic framework, which serves as an environment for creating the works, or (iii) the users of an AI providing input data for it to create the works. All these subjects have potential IP rights to the resulting works, even if there is no strict answer to who is the real author of the work. Therefore, the paper analyses the question of how relevant their contribution to the creative process and to the work per se is, and what could be their potential authorship claim.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Subjects' Relevance Within an AI-included Creative Process

Popis výsledku anglicky

Speaking of the works created by or using artificial intelligence (AI) either in form of specialized software (as the portrait of Edmond Belamy) or an interactive platform (as the DeepArt’s or Humtap’s outcomes), there is an indisputable role of humans. Within such an AI-included creative process, we can find a lot of subjects interacting with an AI, either as (i) the author of an AI per se, (ii) the authors of all the datasets used for creating a basic framework, which serves as an environment for creating the works, or (iii) the users of an AI providing input data for it to create the works. All these subjects have potential IP rights to the resulting works, even if there is no strict answer to who is the real author of the work. Therefore, the paper analyses the question of how relevant their contribution to the creative process and to the work per se is, and what could be their potential authorship claim.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Jusletter IT. Die Zeitschrift für IT und Recht.

ISSN

1664-848X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2019

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

21. Februar

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

1

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85073062598