The Terminal of Marriage in Czech Labor Code

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F21%3A00124945" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/21:00124945 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://bsp.uwb.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/71_bsp-26-2-1.pdf" target="_blank" >http://bsp.uwb.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/71_bsp-26-2-1.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2021.26.02.04" target="_blank" >10.15290/bsp.2021.26.02.04</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Terminal of Marriage in Czech Labor Code

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Th is paper deals with arguments defending the purpose of the existence of the provision of Section 318 of Act No. 262/2006 Coll., Labor Code. Both the arguments of legal scholarship and arguments expressed in the explanatory memorandum to the Acts in question are analyzed. Th is text further presents arguments in favor of repealing this provision which prohibits the performance of dependent work between spouses (registered partners). We base our arguments on international and European Union1 legal sources, in particular on anti -discrimination legislation prohibiting discrimination on the basis of marital status. In the context of Czech law, the relationship between the provision of Section 318 of the Labor Code and constitutional standards and other statutory norms is described and analyzed. A specifi c regulation contained in Act No. 234/2014 Coll., Civil Service Act is also presented and considered. The authors point out the absence of similar legislation in legal orders of other Member States of the European Union. In conclusion, the authors express and defend their legal opinion on the obsolescence of the discussed provision of the Labor Code and present suggestions de lege ferenda.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Terminal of Marriage in Czech Labor Code

Popis výsledku anglicky

Th is paper deals with arguments defending the purpose of the existence of the provision of Section 318 of Act No. 262/2006 Coll., Labor Code. Both the arguments of legal scholarship and arguments expressed in the explanatory memorandum to the Acts in question are analyzed. Th is text further presents arguments in favor of repealing this provision which prohibits the performance of dependent work between spouses (registered partners). We base our arguments on international and European Union1 legal sources, in particular on anti -discrimination legislation prohibiting discrimination on the basis of marital status. In the context of Czech law, the relationship between the provision of Section 318 of the Labor Code and constitutional standards and other statutory norms is described and analyzed. A specifi c regulation contained in Act No. 234/2014 Coll., Civil Service Act is also presented and considered. The authors point out the absence of similar legislation in legal orders of other Member States of the European Union. In conclusion, the authors express and defend their legal opinion on the obsolescence of the discussed provision of the Labor Code and present suggestions de lege ferenda.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Bialystok Legal Studies

ISSN

1689-7404

e-ISSN

2719-9452

Svazek periodika

26

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

71-80

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—