Judicial Review of COVID-19 Restrictive Measures in the Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F22%3A00127520" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/22:00127520 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://administrativescience.com/index.php/instadm/article/view/51/43" target="_blank" >https://administrativescience.com/index.php/instadm/article/view/51/43</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.54201/iajas.v2i2.51" target="_blank" >10.54201/iajas.v2i2.51</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Judicial Review of COVID-19 Restrictive Measures in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The courts ought to be active players during the pandemic crisis to prevent the abuse of power, enhance the quality of the measures taken and their communication and contribute to increasing their legitimacy. The paper focuses on the Czech Constitutional Court and the Supreme Admin-istrative Court (together with regional administrative courts) and assesses whether they lived up to this role. We found that the Constitutional Court was a passive player, which resulted from insufficient procedural legal norms and a formalistic approach by the court itself. On the other hand, the Supreme Administrative Court was – mainly due to a special procedural framework – an active player. Its case law has a real impact and prevents the executive power from making some faults, such as an obvious lack of legal basis or clearly insufficient reasoning.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Judicial Review of COVID-19 Restrictive Measures in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

The courts ought to be active players during the pandemic crisis to prevent the abuse of power, enhance the quality of the measures taken and their communication and contribute to increasing their legitimacy. The paper focuses on the Czech Constitutional Court and the Supreme Admin-istrative Court (together with regional administrative courts) and assesses whether they lived up to this role. We found that the Constitutional Court was a passive player, which resulted from insufficient procedural legal norms and a formalistic approach by the court itself. On the other hand, the Supreme Administrative Court was – mainly due to a special procedural framework – an active player. Its case law has a real impact and prevents the executive power from making some faults, such as an obvious lack of legal basis or clearly insufficient reasoning.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Institutiones Administrationis – Journal of Administrative Sciences

ISSN

2786-1929

e-ISSN

2786-1929

Svazek periodika

2

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

HU - Maďarsko

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

112-131

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—