Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Digitalisation and firm's own price elasticity of demand in dominant position analysis

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F22%3A00140122" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/22:00140122 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.prf.cuni.cz/sites/default/files/soubory/2022-06/EU_ANTITRUST_ebook_2022.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.prf.cuni.cz/sites/default/files/soubory/2022-06/EU_ANTITRUST_ebook_2022.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Digitalisation and firm's own price elasticity of demand in dominant position analysis

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The finding of a dominant position in the EU is still predominantly based on market shares and, consequently, on relevant market definition. It is argued that despite differing views of the legal concept, a dominant position is a function of market power in a regular economic sense. Therefore, economic theory provides more direct tools for its assessment, namely quantification of price elasticity of demand after the product in question (firm's own or product specific price elasticity of demand). The idea is not new, but it has been rejected in the European framework mainly due to its link with an attack against the concept of market definition. It is argued that most of the arguments against it are avoided if it Is accepted that elasticity would be only used for the assessment of market power, not excluding market definition in other steps of an analysis. Impacts of digitalisation may address other arguments against a product specific price elasticity of demand. Namely, it increases the possibility of necessary data for calculations (prices and quantities) being collected and archived. Second, it diminishes the legal certainty and self-assessment functions of the approach assessing dominant position by market definition and market shares. Pre-research confirms that full research would be worth trying. Product specific price elasticity of demand could serve as a valuable tool for a dominant position analysis in certain cases, including cases in digital markets.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Digitalisation and firm's own price elasticity of demand in dominant position analysis

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The finding of a dominant position in the EU is still predominantly based on market shares and, consequently, on relevant market definition. It is argued that despite differing views of the legal concept, a dominant position is a function of market power in a regular economic sense. Therefore, economic theory provides more direct tools for its assessment, namely quantification of price elasticity of demand after the product in question (firm's own or product specific price elasticity of demand). The idea is not new, but it has been rejected in the European framework mainly due to its link with an attack against the concept of market definition. It is argued that most of the arguments against it are avoided if it Is accepted that elasticity would be only used for the assessment of market power, not excluding market definition in other steps of an analysis. Impacts of digitalisation may address other arguments against a product specific price elasticity of demand. Namely, it increases the possibility of necessary data for calculations (prices and quantities) being collected and archived. Second, it diminishes the legal certainty and self-assessment functions of the approach assessing dominant position by market definition and market shares. Pre-research confirms that full research would be worth trying. Product specific price elasticity of demand could serve as a valuable tool for a dominant position analysis in certain cases, including cases in digital markets.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50501 - Law

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2022

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    EU Antitrust: Hot Topics & Next Steps

  • ISBN

    9788076300217

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Počet stran výsledku

    14

  • Strana od-do

    438-451

  • Název nakladatele

    Charles University, Faculty of Law

  • Místo vydání

    Praha

  • Místo konání akce

    Praha

  • Datum konání akce

    1. 1. 2022

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    EUR - Evropská akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001233632900033