Digitalisation and firm's own price elasticity of demand in dominant position analysis
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F22%3A00140122" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/22:00140122 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.prf.cuni.cz/sites/default/files/soubory/2022-06/EU_ANTITRUST_ebook_2022.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.prf.cuni.cz/sites/default/files/soubory/2022-06/EU_ANTITRUST_ebook_2022.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Digitalisation and firm's own price elasticity of demand in dominant position analysis
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The finding of a dominant position in the EU is still predominantly based on market shares and, consequently, on relevant market definition. It is argued that despite differing views of the legal concept, a dominant position is a function of market power in a regular economic sense. Therefore, economic theory provides more direct tools for its assessment, namely quantification of price elasticity of demand after the product in question (firm's own or product specific price elasticity of demand). The idea is not new, but it has been rejected in the European framework mainly due to its link with an attack against the concept of market definition. It is argued that most of the arguments against it are avoided if it Is accepted that elasticity would be only used for the assessment of market power, not excluding market definition in other steps of an analysis. Impacts of digitalisation may address other arguments against a product specific price elasticity of demand. Namely, it increases the possibility of necessary data for calculations (prices and quantities) being collected and archived. Second, it diminishes the legal certainty and self-assessment functions of the approach assessing dominant position by market definition and market shares. Pre-research confirms that full research would be worth trying. Product specific price elasticity of demand could serve as a valuable tool for a dominant position analysis in certain cases, including cases in digital markets.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Digitalisation and firm's own price elasticity of demand in dominant position analysis
Popis výsledku anglicky
The finding of a dominant position in the EU is still predominantly based on market shares and, consequently, on relevant market definition. It is argued that despite differing views of the legal concept, a dominant position is a function of market power in a regular economic sense. Therefore, economic theory provides more direct tools for its assessment, namely quantification of price elasticity of demand after the product in question (firm's own or product specific price elasticity of demand). The idea is not new, but it has been rejected in the European framework mainly due to its link with an attack against the concept of market definition. It is argued that most of the arguments against it are avoided if it Is accepted that elasticity would be only used for the assessment of market power, not excluding market definition in other steps of an analysis. Impacts of digitalisation may address other arguments against a product specific price elasticity of demand. Namely, it increases the possibility of necessary data for calculations (prices and quantities) being collected and archived. Second, it diminishes the legal certainty and self-assessment functions of the approach assessing dominant position by market definition and market shares. Pre-research confirms that full research would be worth trying. Product specific price elasticity of demand could serve as a valuable tool for a dominant position analysis in certain cases, including cases in digital markets.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
EU Antitrust: Hot Topics & Next Steps
ISBN
9788076300217
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
14
Strana od-do
438-451
Název nakladatele
Charles University, Faculty of Law
Místo vydání
Praha
Místo konání akce
Praha
Datum konání akce
1. 1. 2022
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
EUR - Evropská akce
Kód UT WoS článku
001233632900033