The Art of Waiting Humbly: Women Judges Reflect on Vertical Gender Segregation
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F23%3A00131477" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/23:00131477 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10691-023-09533-w?fbclid=IwAR2r9RSe9QzaMTdvoKqNwiitOR7OyIhIRJKKYxuDXdNgkZEmTmwp-IojtXM" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10691-023-09533-w?fbclid=IwAR2r9RSe9QzaMTdvoKqNwiitOR7OyIhIRJKKYxuDXdNgkZEmTmwp-IojtXM</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10691-023-09533-w" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10691-023-09533-w</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The Art of Waiting Humbly: Women Judges Reflect on Vertical Gender Segregation
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Central and Eastern European countries (CEE), compared to common law countries but also other civil law countries of Europe, are known for a strikingly high representation of women within judiciaries. This, however, does not mean that equality has been achieved, as women judges do not reach leadership positions at the same rate as their male peers. Taking the Czech Republic as a case study, this contribution explores the barriers women judges face within a CEE judiciary and analyses their reflections on their positions. The interviews with women judges show that while they are well aware of what is holding them back, most of them do not perceive the structurally unequal position of men and women in Czech society and in the judiciary as a problem and accept the consequences as being part of women’s destiny. This means that the system currently lacks bottom-up incentives and pressure for change.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The Art of Waiting Humbly: Women Judges Reflect on Vertical Gender Segregation
Popis výsledku anglicky
Central and Eastern European countries (CEE), compared to common law countries but also other civil law countries of Europe, are known for a strikingly high representation of women within judiciaries. This, however, does not mean that equality has been achieved, as women judges do not reach leadership positions at the same rate as their male peers. Taking the Czech Republic as a case study, this contribution explores the barriers women judges face within a CEE judiciary and analyses their reflections on their positions. The interviews with women judges show that while they are well aware of what is holding them back, most of them do not perceive the structurally unequal position of men and women in Czech society and in the judiciary as a problem and accept the consequences as being part of women’s destiny. This means that the system currently lacks bottom-up incentives and pressure for change.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Feminist Legal Studies
ISSN
0966-3622
e-ISSN
1572-8455
Svazek periodika
Neuveden
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
18 August
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
26
Strana od-do
1-26
Kód UT WoS článku
001050002200001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85168325209