Robo-advisory as a driving force of the financial market in the light of digitalization?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F23%3A00133033" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/23:00133033 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/wsbjbf-2023-0008" target="_blank" >https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/wsbjbf-2023-0008</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/wsbjbf-2023-0008" target="_blank" >10.2478/wsbjbf-2023-0008</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Robo-advisory as a driving force of the financial market in the light of digitalization?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article deals with the phenomenon of Robo-advisory used in the provision of investment services. It is appropriate to consider the use of this tool from a regulatory perspective, particularly given the widespread use of digital tools in financial markets and the growing interest of users in the digitization of services. Given the rapid development of digitalization, legislation may not always take into account the use of digital tools. Legislative changes may be delayed. The main objective of this article is to analyze Robo-advisory specifically from the perspective of EU regulation. The aim is to confirm or disprove the hypothesis. Based on the analysis, we are then able to look at using Robo-advisory from different perspectives, both practical and regulatory. The analysis also highlights the similarities and differences between traditional and alternative investment service provision.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Robo-advisory as a driving force of the financial market in the light of digitalization?

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article deals with the phenomenon of Robo-advisory used in the provision of investment services. It is appropriate to consider the use of this tool from a regulatory perspective, particularly given the widespread use of digital tools in financial markets and the growing interest of users in the digitization of services. Given the rapid development of digitalization, legislation may not always take into account the use of digital tools. Legislative changes may be delayed. The main objective of this article is to analyze Robo-advisory specifically from the perspective of EU regulation. The aim is to confirm or disprove the hypothesis. Based on the analysis, we are then able to look at using Robo-advisory from different perspectives, both practical and regulatory. The analysis also highlights the similarities and differences between traditional and alternative investment service provision.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

WSB Journal of Business and Finance

ISSN

2657-4950

e-ISSN

2657-4950

Svazek periodika

57

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

66-77

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—