Access to Czech Administrative Courts - Bottlenecks in Access to Justice
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F23%3A00133449" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/23:00133449 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://ppuam.amu.edu.pl/uploads/PPUAM%20vol.%2015/02_Skladalova,%20Hrubesova,%20Svoboda.pdf" target="_blank" >http://ppuam.amu.edu.pl/uploads/PPUAM%20vol.%2015/02_Skladalova,%20Hrubesova,%20Svoboda.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2023.15.02" target="_blank" >10.14746/ppuam.2023.15.02</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Access to Czech Administrative Courts - Bottlenecks in Access to Justice
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The right of access to a court is subject to certain limitations. While a number of these limitations may be created deliberately, in line with the function of the administrative justice system (e.g. restrictions on review by the higher courts, others may be more or less unintended consequences of the design of the administrative justice system (or application of relevant rules or case -law). The article attempts to present possible forms of these limitations and tries to outline some of the main “bottlenecks” in the access to judicial protection in the context of Czech administrative justice. These limitations can be regarded mainly as formal and informal, and their recognition can result in increasing the efficiency of the functioning of judicial protection, in particular by simplifying procedural regulation in relation to the ongoing societal and technological changes.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Access to Czech Administrative Courts - Bottlenecks in Access to Justice
Popis výsledku anglicky
The right of access to a court is subject to certain limitations. While a number of these limitations may be created deliberately, in line with the function of the administrative justice system (e.g. restrictions on review by the higher courts, others may be more or less unintended consequences of the design of the administrative justice system (or application of relevant rules or case -law). The article attempts to present possible forms of these limitations and tries to outline some of the main “bottlenecks” in the access to judicial protection in the context of Czech administrative justice. These limitations can be regarded mainly as formal and informal, and their recognition can result in increasing the efficiency of the functioning of judicial protection, in particular by simplifying procedural regulation in relation to the ongoing societal and technological changes.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
ISSN
2083-9782
e-ISSN
2083-9782
Svazek periodika
15
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
PL - Polská republika
Počet stran výsledku
22
Strana od-do
37-58
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85186224600