Superjudges and the Separation of Powers: A Case Study of Judicial Informality in Czechia
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F23%3A00133885" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/23:00133885 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/german-law-journal/article/superjudges-and-the-separation-of-powers-a-case-study-of-judicial-informality-in-czechia/8D0BE782C1FE20DDCAC2CB44B2297BD3#article" target="_blank" >https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/german-law-journal/article/superjudges-and-the-separation-of-powers-a-case-study-of-judicial-informality-in-czechia/8D0BE782C1FE20DDCAC2CB44B2297BD3#article</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.68" target="_blank" >10.1017/glj.2023.68</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Superjudges and the Separation of Powers: A Case Study of Judicial Informality in Czechia
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Examining the practices of i) the selection of judges, ii) panel composition and case assignment, and iii) judicial off-bench activities, the article argues that some Czech judges, most often court presidents and apex court judges, use informal judicial institutions as tools to increase their influence on judicial administration and the decision-making of courts. As a result, these judges have far greater influence than the formal account of their roles might suggest. The article explores the context which facilitated the informal rise of these “Superjudges”, asserting that the key factors were institutionally independent judiciaries with individually dependent judges, the absence of a shared understanding of fundamental constitutional concepts, and the underperformance of Czech legal academia. The article then contends that while Superjudges may contribute to an informed, effective, and politically independent functioning of the judiciary, they also risk eroding important divisions of power which, in turn, might compromise the integrity of the judicial process, undermine the authority of courts, and disconnect the content of the law from the general interest.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Superjudges and the Separation of Powers: A Case Study of Judicial Informality in Czechia
Popis výsledku anglicky
Examining the practices of i) the selection of judges, ii) panel composition and case assignment, and iii) judicial off-bench activities, the article argues that some Czech judges, most often court presidents and apex court judges, use informal judicial institutions as tools to increase their influence on judicial administration and the decision-making of courts. As a result, these judges have far greater influence than the formal account of their roles might suggest. The article explores the context which facilitated the informal rise of these “Superjudges”, asserting that the key factors were institutionally independent judiciaries with individually dependent judges, the absence of a shared understanding of fundamental constitutional concepts, and the underperformance of Czech legal academia. The article then contends that while Superjudges may contribute to an informed, effective, and politically independent functioning of the judiciary, they also risk eroding important divisions of power which, in turn, might compromise the integrity of the judicial process, undermine the authority of courts, and disconnect the content of the law from the general interest.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
German Law Journal
ISSN
2071-8322
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
24
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
8
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
18
Strana od-do
1282-1299
Kód UT WoS článku
999
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85187537853