Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Superjudges and the Separation of Powers: A Case Study of Judicial Informality in Czechia

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F23%3A00133885" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/23:00133885 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/german-law-journal/article/superjudges-and-the-separation-of-powers-a-case-study-of-judicial-informality-in-czechia/8D0BE782C1FE20DDCAC2CB44B2297BD3#article" target="_blank" >https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/german-law-journal/article/superjudges-and-the-separation-of-powers-a-case-study-of-judicial-informality-in-czechia/8D0BE782C1FE20DDCAC2CB44B2297BD3#article</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.68" target="_blank" >10.1017/glj.2023.68</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Superjudges and the Separation of Powers: A Case Study of Judicial Informality in Czechia

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Examining the practices of i) the selection of judges, ii) panel composition and case assignment, and iii) judicial off-bench activities, the article argues that some Czech judges, most often court presidents and apex court judges, use informal judicial institutions as tools to increase their influence on judicial administration and the decision-making of courts. As a result, these judges have far greater influence than the formal account of their roles might suggest. The article explores the context which facilitated the informal rise of these “Superjudges”, asserting that the key factors were institutionally independent judiciaries with individually dependent judges, the absence of a shared understanding of fundamental constitutional concepts, and the underperformance of Czech legal academia. The article then contends that while Superjudges may contribute to an informed, effective, and politically independent functioning of the judiciary, they also risk eroding important divisions of power which, in turn, might compromise the integrity of the judicial process, undermine the authority of courts, and disconnect the content of the law from the general interest.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Superjudges and the Separation of Powers: A Case Study of Judicial Informality in Czechia

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Examining the practices of i) the selection of judges, ii) panel composition and case assignment, and iii) judicial off-bench activities, the article argues that some Czech judges, most often court presidents and apex court judges, use informal judicial institutions as tools to increase their influence on judicial administration and the decision-making of courts. As a result, these judges have far greater influence than the formal account of their roles might suggest. The article explores the context which facilitated the informal rise of these “Superjudges”, asserting that the key factors were institutionally independent judiciaries with individually dependent judges, the absence of a shared understanding of fundamental constitutional concepts, and the underperformance of Czech legal academia. The article then contends that while Superjudges may contribute to an informed, effective, and politically independent functioning of the judiciary, they also risk eroding important divisions of power which, in turn, might compromise the integrity of the judicial process, undermine the authority of courts, and disconnect the content of the law from the general interest.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50501 - Law

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2023

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    German Law Journal

  • ISSN

    2071-8322

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    24

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    8

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    18

  • Strana od-do

    1282-1299

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    999

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85187537853