(No) Ghost in the Shell: The Role of Values Internalization in Judicial Empowerment in Slovakia
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F23%3A00133879" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/23:00133879 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/german-law-journal/article/no-ghost-in-the-shell-the-role-of-values-internalization-in-judicial-empowerment-in-slovakia/03EC62EF44F620FD337B1FC686741B4A" target="_blank" >https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/german-law-journal/article/no-ghost-in-the-shell-the-role-of-values-internalization-in-judicial-empowerment-in-slovakia/03EC62EF44F620FD337B1FC686741B4A</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.88" target="_blank" >10.1017/glj.2023.88</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
(No) Ghost in the Shell: The Role of Values Internalization in Judicial Empowerment in Slovakia
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This article uses the case study of Slovakia and its lackluster experience with a judge-dominated judicial council to demonstrate that formal institutions have only limited impact on the ideational level. We show that the transformation of the Slovak post-communist judiciary relied on the presumption that judges‘ interests are automatically complementary to principles of the rule of law. Therefore, the majority of implemented reforms insulated the judiciary from the political branches of power, but allowed strong hierarchical relationships inside the courts to exist. In contrast to international expectations, judicial authorities used judicial empowerment to create or strengthen competing informal practices, which helped them to maximize their power. We argue that the lack of internalization of judicial independence might explain why institutional self-governance reforms failed to trigger changes in the professional role conception of judges in regimes riddled with deeply embedded informal institutions. In order to tackle this problem, we propose that future research on the relationship between institutional safeguards and decisional judicial independence should focus on the process through which actors internalize new institutional incentives.
Název v anglickém jazyce
(No) Ghost in the Shell: The Role of Values Internalization in Judicial Empowerment in Slovakia
Popis výsledku anglicky
This article uses the case study of Slovakia and its lackluster experience with a judge-dominated judicial council to demonstrate that formal institutions have only limited impact on the ideational level. We show that the transformation of the Slovak post-communist judiciary relied on the presumption that judges‘ interests are automatically complementary to principles of the rule of law. Therefore, the majority of implemented reforms insulated the judiciary from the political branches of power, but allowed strong hierarchical relationships inside the courts to exist. In contrast to international expectations, judicial authorities used judicial empowerment to create or strengthen competing informal practices, which helped them to maximize their power. We argue that the lack of internalization of judicial independence might explain why institutional self-governance reforms failed to trigger changes in the professional role conception of judges in regimes riddled with deeply embedded informal institutions. In order to tackle this problem, we propose that future research on the relationship between institutional safeguards and decisional judicial independence should focus on the process through which actors internalize new institutional incentives.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
German Law Journal
ISSN
2071-8322
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
24
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
8
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
20
Strana od-do
1412-1431
Kód UT WoS článku
999
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85187532707