Independence of the Judiciary from the Perspective of the Council of Europe or what inspiration judges should take from developments in Poland and Hungary

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F23%3A00134778" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/23:00134778 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.dyskurs.inp.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/DPiA" target="_blank" >http://www.dyskurs.inp.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/DPiA</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Independence of the Judiciary from the Perspective of the Council of Europe or what inspiration judges should take from developments in Poland and Hungary

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article discusses the basic documents of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) dealing generally with the rule of law and judicial independence as one of its main guarantees and the Venice Commission’s opinions concerning the situation in Hungary and Poland. There is author´s personal experience as a rapporteur of some of these opinions. The article offers a summary of the principal reasons why it has been quite easy to attack judicial independence in these countries and how it has happened. The article also contains the description of the rule of law as one of the foundations of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the analysis of the recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Grzęda v. Poland and the conclusions the Court has drawn in relation to the issue of the rule of law.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Independence of the Judiciary from the Perspective of the Council of Europe or what inspiration judges should take from developments in Poland and Hungary

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article discusses the basic documents of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) dealing generally with the rule of law and judicial independence as one of its main guarantees and the Venice Commission’s opinions concerning the situation in Hungary and Poland. There is author´s personal experience as a rapporteur of some of these opinions. The article offers a summary of the principal reasons why it has been quite easy to attack judicial independence in these countries and how it has happened. The article also contains the description of the rule of law as one of the foundations of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the analysis of the recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Grzęda v. Poland and the conclusions the Court has drawn in relation to the issue of the rule of law.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Dyskurs Prawniczy i Administracyjny

ISSN

2657-926X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2023

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3/2023

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

15-26

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—