2030 Agenda and Sustainable Migration Governance: A Comparison Between European Union and Brazilian Contexts

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F23%3A00140173" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/23:00140173 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://periodicos.ufc.br/nomos/article/view/83196/250533" target="_blank" >https://periodicos.ufc.br/nomos/article/view/83196/250533</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

2030 Agenda and Sustainable Migration Governance: A Comparison Between European Union and Brazilian Contexts

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The main focus of this paper is to analyse and compare the European Union and Brazilian current migration contexts, through the 2030 Agenda and sustainable migration governance framework. Other than that, it tries to understand, throughout a historical and contextual reconstruction, how the sharing of best practices between those two actors could collaborate in the construction of migration governance that would lead to a reasoning which will substantiate effective legislation and politics in this matter. In this scenario, the contextualist-historical method is adopted, as it is the most suitable and reliable for understanding and better assessing the topic, in order the anticipate the epistemological issues that could arise from this work. Besides that, an interdisciplinary comparative analysis is also necessary. The migration approach that is not concerned with mobilizing legal theory or the cultural context of its objects is not capable of producing nothing but theoretical constructions allegedly scientific and, at worst, wrong conclusions. This paper outlines an unprecedented and necessary strategy for addressing this subject in order to fill the existing literature gap in the field, both in terms of topic and methodology. After a brief overview of the proposed topics, it concludes that although it is not possible to speak of joy or celebration in the context of migration governance, which involves so many still suffering and being forced to leave their homes due to individual persecutions, conflicts, or so many other reasons, whether in Europe or South America without a doubt, the response given in Brazil to the large flux of migration which the country received in the last years feeds the hope that it is possible to welcome these people with more dignity and humanity, serving as an example to the rest of the world.

Název v anglickém jazyce

2030 Agenda and Sustainable Migration Governance: A Comparison Between European Union and Brazilian Contexts

Popis výsledku anglicky

The main focus of this paper is to analyse and compare the European Union and Brazilian current migration contexts, through the 2030 Agenda and sustainable migration governance framework. Other than that, it tries to understand, throughout a historical and contextual reconstruction, how the sharing of best practices between those two actors could collaborate in the construction of migration governance that would lead to a reasoning which will substantiate effective legislation and politics in this matter. In this scenario, the contextualist-historical method is adopted, as it is the most suitable and reliable for understanding and better assessing the topic, in order the anticipate the epistemological issues that could arise from this work. Besides that, an interdisciplinary comparative analysis is also necessary. The migration approach that is not concerned with mobilizing legal theory or the cultural context of its objects is not capable of producing nothing but theoretical constructions allegedly scientific and, at worst, wrong conclusions. This paper outlines an unprecedented and necessary strategy for addressing this subject in order to fill the existing literature gap in the field, both in terms of topic and methodology. After a brief overview of the proposed topics, it concludes that although it is not possible to speak of joy or celebration in the context of migration governance, which involves so many still suffering and being forced to leave their homes due to individual persecutions, conflicts, or so many other reasons, whether in Europe or South America without a doubt, the response given in Brazil to the large flux of migration which the country received in the last years feeds the hope that it is possible to welcome these people with more dignity and humanity, serving as an example to the rest of the world.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

NOMOS Revista

ISSN

1807-3840

e-ISSN

1807-3840

Svazek periodika

43

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

BR - Brazilská federativní republika

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

233-254

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—