Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F24%3A00136595" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/24:00136595 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13647" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13647</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13647" target="_blank" >10.1111/jcms.13647</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In this article, we introduce an innovative theoretical framework to analyse the use of differentiated implementation in the implementation process of European Union (EU) Directives. We identify rationales for offering flexibility in EU Directives as well as motives for policy-makers to make use of the discretion. We analyse patterns and drivers of differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) in four member states in order to assess whether practices of differentiated implementation conform to the rationales for offering flexibility. We show that member states mainly use the flexibility offered to retain existing policies. In addition, the EED led to some mutual learning based on experimentation, although this effect is limited. Whilst the EED offered a high potential for mutual learning, the member states did not use this opportunity. Overall, the implementation of the EED offers mixed evidence for the use of differentiated implementation to support differentiation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive

Popis výsledku anglicky

In this article, we introduce an innovative theoretical framework to analyse the use of differentiated implementation in the implementation process of European Union (EU) Directives. We identify rationales for offering flexibility in EU Directives as well as motives for policy-makers to make use of the discretion. We analyse patterns and drivers of differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) in four member states in order to assess whether practices of differentiated implementation conform to the rationales for offering flexibility. We show that member states mainly use the flexibility offered to retain existing policies. In addition, the EED led to some mutual learning based on experimentation, although this effect is limited. Whilst the EED offered a high potential for mutual learning, the member states did not use this opportunity. Overall, the implementation of the EED offers mixed evidence for the use of differentiated implementation to support differentiation.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies

ISSN

0021-9886

e-ISSN

1468-5965

Svazek periodika

63

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

745-764

Kód UT WoS článku

001274742100001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105001726990