Different yet the same? Differentiated integration and flexibility in implementation in the European Union

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F24%3A00140093" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/24:00140093 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01402382.2022.2150944" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01402382.2022.2150944</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2150944" target="_blank" >10.1080/01402382.2022.2150944</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Different yet the same? Differentiated integration and flexibility in implementation in the European Union

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Differentiated integration (DI) and flexibility in implementation (FI) are two forms of differentiation that can be used to cope with heterogeneity among EU member states. Given the different ways in which they do so, this article asks whether DI and FI are alternatives for each other or whether they serve different functions in EU legislation. Based on a dataset that maps the occurrence of opt-outs and flexibility provisions in EU directives, the analysis shows that DI and FI tend to be used together. A qualitative analysis of directives that combine different levels of DI and FI shows that, within that overall pattern, DI is used to accommodate individual outliers, while FI is used to address widespread concerns among member states. This suggests that DI and FI are two forms of differentiation in the EU, which are used to address different aspects of a common underlying set of concerns.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Different yet the same? Differentiated integration and flexibility in implementation in the European Union

Popis výsledku anglicky

Differentiated integration (DI) and flexibility in implementation (FI) are two forms of differentiation that can be used to cope with heterogeneity among EU member states. Given the different ways in which they do so, this article asks whether DI and FI are alternatives for each other or whether they serve different functions in EU legislation. Based on a dataset that maps the occurrence of opt-outs and flexibility provisions in EU directives, the analysis shows that DI and FI tend to be used together. A qualitative analysis of directives that combine different levels of DI and FI shows that, within that overall pattern, DI is used to accommodate individual outliers, while FI is used to address widespread concerns among member states. This suggests that DI and FI are two forms of differentiation in the EU, which are used to address different aspects of a common underlying set of concerns.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50602 - Public administration

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

West european politics

ISSN

0140-2382

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

47

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

25

Strana od-do

466-490

Kód UT WoS článku

000895842300001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85143615863