Constitutional Conventions in Central Europe: When Two Are Doing the Same It Is Not Always the Same

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F25%3A00140640" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/25:00140640 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003506577-10/constitutional-conventions-czechia-hungary-david-kosa%C5%99-attila-vincze" target="_blank" >https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003506577-10/constitutional-conventions-czechia-hungary-david-kosa%C5%99-attila-vincze</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003506577-10" target="_blank" >10.4324/9781003506577-10</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Constitutional Conventions in Central Europe: When Two Are Doing the Same It Is Not Always the Same

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The aim of this chapter is thus to explore whether there are any differences between the individual Czechia and Hungary cases concerning constitutional conventions, and if so, what explains these differences and what repercussions these differences have for the legal and political life of these countries. It shows that there are actually significant differences between these two countries. Czechia has embraced constitutional conventions – albeit in relatively few areas – and the Constitutional Court, as well as the Supreme Administrative Court, found some of them justiciable and even decisive for the outcome of some cases. In contrast, Hungary has so far resisted justiciability, as well as a thorough discussion of constitutional conventions.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Constitutional Conventions in Central Europe: When Two Are Doing the Same It Is Not Always the Same

Popis výsledku anglicky

The aim of this chapter is thus to explore whether there are any differences between the individual Czechia and Hungary cases concerning constitutional conventions, and if so, what explains these differences and what repercussions these differences have for the legal and political life of these countries. It shows that there are actually significant differences between these two countries. Czechia has embraced constitutional conventions – albeit in relatively few areas – and the Constitutional Court, as well as the Supreme Administrative Court, found some of them justiciable and even decisive for the outcome of some cases. In contrast, Hungary has so far resisted justiciability, as well as a thorough discussion of constitutional conventions.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Constitutional Conventions Theories, Practices and Dynamics

ISBN

9781032828336

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

177-196

Počet stran knihy

212

Název nakladatele

Routledge

Místo vydání

London - New York

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—