Inspiring QCA: An Alternative Approach for Security Studies

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F13%3A00068856" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/13:00068856 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Inspiring QCA: An Alternative Approach for Security Studies

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The goal of the paper is to present Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as a functional alternative to the mainstream research methods in social sciences, particularly, security studies. The main argument tries to initiate greater sympathy in the approach and to elaborate the opportunities that the technique offers. On the basis of re-linking the core methodological debate in social sciences with the security studies disputes, the outcome presents the possible application of QCA in security sector and advocates for its usage. In this context, QCA is perceived as a real alternative to conventional practices. Through the analysis of mainstream methodological discussion (KKV versus George and Bennett) and the debate about formal models in security studies, the paper reveals possible pitfalls in social science research. To cope with these limitations, QCA is presented and evaluated in a way of alternative approach.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Inspiring QCA: An Alternative Approach for Security Studies

Popis výsledku anglicky

The goal of the paper is to present Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as a functional alternative to the mainstream research methods in social sciences, particularly, security studies. The main argument tries to initiate greater sympathy in the approach and to elaborate the opportunities that the technique offers. On the basis of re-linking the core methodological debate in social sciences with the security studies disputes, the outcome presents the possible application of QCA in security sector and advocates for its usage. In this context, QCA is perceived as a real alternative to conventional practices. Through the analysis of mainstream methodological discussion (KKV versus George and Bennett) and the debate about formal models in security studies, the paper reveals possible pitfalls in social science research. To cope with these limitations, QCA is presented and evaluated in a way of alternative approach.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Peace & Conflict Review

ISSN

1659-3995

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

7

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CR - Kostarická republika

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

68-84

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—